In our connected society, non-extradition countries attract those seeking to avoid legal issues or political persecution, promising a sanctuary free from extradition.
However, these treaties are not always guaranteed; governments can disregard them when pressured. This guide will take you through non-extradition countries to consider in 2024, highlighting some of the factors that make these regions noteworthy when looking for the best countries for extradition agreements.
What are non-extradition countries?
Non-extradition countries are nations that do not have formal extradition treaties with certain other countries, meaning they are not obligated to hand over individuals accused or convicted of crimes to those requesting nations.
These treaties are legal agreements that facilitate the transfer of fugitives across borders to face justice in the requesting country.
Countries without such treaties might refuse extradition for various reasons, including political considerations, differing legal systems, or concerns about human rights abuses in the requesting country. For example, a country may refuse to extradite someone if they face the death penalty, torture, or unfair trials.
Why some countries don’t always honor non-extradition treaties
Non-extradition countries can sometimes become havens for those seeking to avoid legal consequences in their home countries. However, residing in a non-extradition country does not guarantee complete immunity from prosecution, as local laws may still apply, and international diplomatic pressures can influence decisions.
Additionally, some countries without formal treaties may still cooperate on a case-by-case basis through diplomatic channels. Non-extradition treaties, while providing a certain degree of protection, may not be foolproof. It is essential to understand that:
- Non-extradition treaties are not consistently recognized or honored by foreign governments, making them potentially unreliable as a complete safeguard against extradition.
- The recognition and enforcement of non-extradition treaties depend on the political relationship and diplomatic ties between the countries involved.
- Some governments may overlook or violate these agreements under certain circumstances, such as political pressure, national security concerns, or significant diplomatic events.
- It is crucial for individuals considering non-extradition countries to thoroughly research the specific country’s track record in honoring these non-extradition treaties and consult legal professionals for a comprehensive understanding of the risks involved.
- Relying solely on countries with no extradition treaties can be risky, and additional measures should be taken to ensure personal safety and avoid legal complications, such as maintaining a low profile, abiding by laws, and seeking advice from experts in international legislation.
8 Best Non-Extradition Countries
For countries to be considered the best non-extraditions countries, these are factors that contribute to their attractiveness as safe havens:
- Stable Legal Systems
- Absence of Extradition Treaties
- Political Neutrality
- Strong Privacy Laws
1. United States
The US has a vast network of extradition treaties with over 100 countries. Its comprehensive legal framework and active pursuit of international fugitives make it a central player in global extradition efforts. The US also has mechanisms for handling extradition requests with significant attention to legal procedures and human rights protections.
2. United Kingdom
The UK is another country considered the best non-extradition country because it has extensive extradition agreements with numerous countries, facilitated by its membership in international bodies such as the European Union (before Brexit) and the Council of Europe. Its legal system provides robust legal procedures for extradition and emphasizes judicial oversight.
3. Canada
Canada maintains many extradition treaties, supporting global law enforcement collaboration. Its legal system requires a thorough review process for extradition requests under each official extradition treaty, ensuring fairness and adherence to international standards.
4. Australia
Australia is active in international extradition, maintaining extensive extradition treaties with many countries. Its extradition processes are supported by a legal system that ensures detailed judicial reviews and protections for those facing extradition. In cases involving countries without extradition agreements, Australia carefully assesses the legal consequences to uphold its legal standards and human rights commitments.
5. Germany
Germany’s extensive network of extradition treaties reflects its commitment to international legal cooperation. Its legal framework includes strong procedural safeguards and human rights considerations, ensuring a fair extradition process. However, for those in non-extradition countries, the role of law enforcement agencies and diplomatic relations can still influence the extradition process and international legal dynamics.
6. Netherlands
The Netherlands is a critical player in international extradition, with agreements covering numerous countries. It is known for its adherence to international legal standards and human rights protections in the extradition process.
7. France
France has a comprehensive network of extradition treaties with many countries. Its legal system supports international cooperation and has mechanisms for handling extradition requests, focusing on human rights and judicial fairness. For individuals in non-extradition countries, the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies and diplomatic relations can still impact the extradition process and international legal interactions.
8. Sweden
Sweden maintains extensive extradition treaties with various countries and is known for its rigorous extradition processes. Its legal system emphasizes fairness and human rights when handling extradition requests, which contributes to its strong reputation in global law enforcement. In cases involving countries without extradition agreements, Sweden carefully evaluates the legal consequences to ensure decisions align with its principles of justice and human rights.
9 Countries with No Extradition Treaty with the US
The United States is often a focus of searches on non-extradition countries due to its extensive network of extradition treaties and a strict legal system that pursues crimes like financial fraud and tax evasion.
Its aggressive stance on extradition, high-profile cases, and strict laws like FATCA makes it crucial for some individuals to identify countries where they might avoid legal consequences.
Therefore, for individuals seeking to avoid extradition to the United States through securing residency in countries with extradition to the US in 2024, the following are countries without extradition:
1. Brunei
A small sovereign state on the island of Borneo, Brunei does not have an extradition agreement with the US. This Southeast Asian nation offers a peaceful environment known for its rich cultural heritage and beautiful landscapes.
2. Russia
Russia and its neighbor China are significant global powers and widely recognized countries that do not have an extradition agreement with the US. These countries have complex legal systems and strict control over extradition processes, making it challenging for the US government to secure the transfer of individuals wanted for legal proceedings.
3. Gulf States
Several Gulf States, including the UAE, Qatar, and Bahrain, do not have a bilateral extradition treaty with the United States. These countries offer a luxurious lifestyle, modern infrastructure, and opportunities for business and investment. However, it is important to note that political considerations and diplomatic negotiations can influence extradition verdicts in the Gulf States.
4. Montenegro
Montenegro, a picturesque Balkan country, has no extradition agreement with the United States. Known for its stunning coastline along the Adriatic Sea, Montenegro offers a blend of historical charm and natural beauty, making it an attractive destination for those seeking refuge.
5. Ukraine and Moldova
Neither Ukraine nor Moldova, Eastern European countries, have extradition treaties with the United States. These nations provide a mix of diverse cultures, rich histories, and scenic landscapes. However, it is essential to consider the political situation and regional dynamics when contemplating these destinations. The support the Ukrainian government currently receives from the US government may affect extradition treaties and policies.
6. Vietnam
Vietnam and other countries like Cambodia and Mongolia are Southeast Asian nations without extradition treaties with the US. Vietnam offers a captivating blend of bustling cities and serene landscapes, while Cambodia boasts ancient temples and a unique cultural experience. Mongolia, known for its vast steppes and nomadic traditions, offers a peaceful and remote escape from legal complications.
7. Maldives, Vanuatu, Tunisia
The Maldives, Vanuatu, and Tunisia are diverse countries without treaties with the United States. The Maldives is renowned for its idyllic beaches and luxury resorts, while Tunisia, located in North Africa, offers a mix of historical sites, vibrant culture, and Mediterranean charm. Participation in the Vanuatu citizenship by investment program is open to US citizens, and it’s worth noting that Vanuatu maintains no extradition treaty with the United States.
8. Ecuador
Ecuador and its neighbor Venezuela are the only South American countries with no extradition treaty with the US. While Venezuela is amid an economic and political crisis, Ecuador maintains relative stability and has many visa options for obtaining a residence permit.
9. Ethiopia
Ethiopia and other countries like Botswana and Uganda are African countries that do not have extradition treaties with the United States. These are also some of the few countries with no extradition treaty with the US that speak English.
Ethiopia is known for its ancient civilization and breathtaking landscapes, while Botswana offers abundant wildlife and stunning national parks. Uganda, with its diverse wildlife and natural wonders, provides a mix of adventure and cultural exploration.
Please note that the absence of an extradition treaty does not guarantee absolute immunity from extradition demands, as political variables and diplomatic discussions can influence extradition decisions. Additionally, it is crucial to understand these countries’ local legal systems and cultural norms when considering them as potential safe havens.
Countries With and Without Extradition Treaties With Others
African Countries | Extradition Treaties |
Algeria | No |
Angola | No |
Benin | No |
Botswana | No |
Burkina Faso | No |
Burundi | No |
Cabo Verde | Yes |
Cameroon | No |
Central African Republic | No |
Chad | No |
Comoros | No |
Congo | Yes |
Democratic Republic of the Congo | No |
Djibouti | No |
Egypt | Yes |
Equatorial Guinea | No |
Eritrea | No |
Eswatini | Yes |
Ethiopia | No |
Gabon | No |
Ghana | Yes |
Guinea | No |
Guinea-Bissau | No |
Ivory Coast | No |
Kenya | Yes |
Lesotho | Yes |
Liberia | Yes |
Libya | No |
Madagascar | No |
Malawi | Yes |
Mali | No |
Mauritania | No |
Morocco | No |
Mozambique | No |
Namibia | No |
Niger | No |
Nigeria | Yes |
Rwanda | No |
Senegal | No |
Seychelles | Yes |
Sierra Leone | Yes |
Somalia | No |
Somaliland | Yes |
South Africa | Yes |
South Sudan | No |
Sudan | No |
São Tomé and Príncipe | No |
Tanzania | Yes |
The Gambia | Yes |
Togo | No |
Tunisia | No |
Uganda | No |
Western Sahara | No |
Zambia | Yes |
Zimbabwe | Yes |
European Countries | Extratidion Treaties |
Albania | Yes |
Andorra | No |
Armenia | No |
Austria | Yes |
Azerbaijan | No |
Belarus | No |
Belgium | Yes |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | Yes |
Bulgaria | Yes |
Croatia | Yes |
Cyprus | No |
Czech Republic | Yes |
Denmark | Yes |
Estonia | Yes |
Finland | Yes |
France | Yes |
Georgia | No |
Germany | Yes |
Greece | Yes |
Hungary | Yes |
Iceland | Yes |
Ireland | Yes |
Italy | Yes |
Kosovo | No |
Latvia | Yes |
Liechtenstein | Yes |
Lithuania | Yes |
Luxembourg | Yes |
Macedonia | No |
Malta | Yes |
Moldova | No |
Monaco | Yes |
Montenegro | Yes |
Netherlands | Yes |
Norway | Yes |
Poland | Yes |
Portugal | Yes |
Romania | Yes |
San Marino | Yes |
Serbia | Yes |
Slovakia | Yes |
Slovenia | Yes |
Spain | Yes |
Sweden | Yes |
Switzerland | Yes |
Turkey | Yes |
Ukraine | No |
United Kingdom | Yes |
Vatican City | No |
Unlock global opportunities through citizenship by investment
American Countries | Extradition Treaties |
Antigua and Barbuda | Yes |
Barbados | Yes |
Belize | Yes |
Bolivia | Yes |
Brazil | Yes |
Canada | Yes |
Chile | Yes |
Colombia | Yes |
Costa Rica | Yes |
Cuba | No |
Dominica | Yes |
Dominican Republic | Yes |
Ecuador | Yes |
El Salvador | Yes |
Grenada | Yes |
Guatemala | Yes |
Guyana | Yes |
Haiti | Yes |
Honduras | Yes |
Jamaica | Yes |
Mexico | Yes |
Nicaragua | Yes |
Panama | Yes |
Paraguay | Yes |
Peru | Yes |
Saint Kitts and Nevis | Yes |
Saint Lucia | Yes |
Saint Martin | No |
Saint Pierre and Miquelon | No |
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Yes |
Suriname | Yes |
The Bahamas | Yes |
Trinidad and Tobago | Yes |
Unites States | Yes |
Uruguay | Yes |
Venezuela | Yes |
Asian Countries | Extradition Treaties |
Afghanistan | No |
Argentina | Yes |
Bahrain | No |
Bangladesh | No |
Bhutan | No |
Brunei | No |
Cambodia | No |
China | No |
East Timor | No |
Hong Kong | Yes |
India | Yes |
Indonesia | No |
Iran | No |
Iraq | Yes |
Israel | Yes |
Japan | Yes |
Jordan | Yes |
Kazakhstan | No |
Kuwait | No |
Kyrgyzstan | No |
Laos | No |
Lebanon | No |
Malaysia | Yes |
Maldives | No |
Mauritius | Yes |
Mongolia | No |
Myanmar | Yes |
Nepal | No |
North Korea | No |
Oman | No |
Pakistan | Yes |
Palestine | No |
Philippines | Yes |
Qatar | No |
Russia | No |
Saudi Arabia | No |
Siachen Glacier | No |
Singapore | Yes |
Solomon Islands | No |
South Korea | Yes |
Sri Lanka | Yes |
Syria | No |
Taiwan | No |
Tajikistan | No |
Thailand | Yes |
Turkmenistan | No |
United Arab Emirates | No |
Uzbekistan | No |
Vietnam | No |
Yemen | No |
Oceanian/Pacific Countries | Extradition Treaties |
Australia | Yes |
Fiji | Yes |
Marshall Islands | Yes |
Micronesia | Yes |
Nauru | Yes |
New Zealand | Yes |
Palau | Yes |
Papua New Guinea | Yes |
Samoa | No |
Solomon Islands | Yes |
Tonga | Yes |
Vanuatu | No |
Non-Extradition Countries versus Countries with No Diplomatic Ties
It is essential to distinguish between non-extradition countries and countries without diplomatic ties. While both categories provide potential safeguards against extradition, the underlying dynamics differ significantly:
Non-Extradition Countries | Countries with No Diplomatic Ties |
Have specific agreements with law enforcement agencies that legally prevent individuals’ transfer through extradition, such as for those granted asylum due to the threat of political persecution. | Lack of formal political relations with particular countries does not automatically imply refusal of extradition requests. |
Provide a higher level of protection against extradition due to established legal frameworks explicitly prohibiting it. | Consider calls for extradition on a case-by-case basis, considering factors such as political negotiations, international pressure, or bilateral agreements with other nations. |
Generally, it offers a more reliable safeguard against potential extradition as the legal framework is explicitly designed to prevent it. | Calls for extradition may still be considered depending on the circumstances and the requesting country’s policies despite the absence of formal diplomatic relations. |
It is advisable for individuals seeking to avoid extradition to focus on countries with non-extradition agreements for more reliable protection. | Individuals should exercise caution and thoroughly research the specific country’s extradition policies, despite the absence of diplomatic ties, as various factors can still influence extradition decisions. |
Difference Between Countries Having No Extradition Treaty and Not Extraditing
Understanding the difference between countries without an extradition treaty and those that choose not to extradite is crucial:
Having No Extradition Treaty | Not Extraditing |
Refers to countries that have not entered into a more formal treaty or agreement with another country regarding extradition. | Refers to a country’s decision not to extradite individuals despite being the only country with an extradition treaty. |
Does not establish a legal obligation to extradite individuals, but the extradition process can still occur based on diplomatic discussions or political considerations. | Reflects a discretionary approach by the country, where requests for extradition are evaluated on a case-by-case basis. |
The lack of an extradition treaty may provide a certain level of protection against extradition proceedings, but it does not guarantee immunity from extradition requests. | The decision not to extradite can be influenced by factors such as the severity of the crime, human rights concerns, legal consequences, political implications, or national interests. |
Examples include countries like Russia, China, Brunei, Montenegro, Ukraine, Moldova, Vietnam, Cambodia, Mongolia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Ethiopia, Botswana, and Uganda. | Examples include countries like Switzerland, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom, among other countries, which may refuse extradition requests in specific cases based on legal, humanitarian, or political reasons. |
Individuals should be aware that the absence of an extradition treaty does not necessarily guarantee safety from extradition, as diplomatic negotiations and political factors can still lead to extradition. | Individuals should understand that the decision not to extradite is discretionary and can vary depending on the circumstances and considerations of the foreign country being involved. |
Explore Golden Visa programs: a path to residency and citizenship
Famous Cases of Extradition and Non-Extradition
Extradition cases involving high-profile individuals have often made headlines and shed light on the complexities of international law and diplomatic relations. Here are some notable cases of extradition and non-extradition:
Extradition
- Julian Assange: The founder of WikiLeaks was facing requests for extradition to the United States for charges related to leaking classified information. Assange remained in London’s Belmarsh Prison until his release to his native Australia in 2024. He was fighting extradition to the United States to face allegations of espionage and conspiring to hack into the Pentagon’s computer network.
- Roman Polanski: Film director Roman Polanski faced requests for extradition from the United States for charges of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor. Despite various attempts by the US authorities, Polanski has managed to prevent extradition by residing in countries that do not have bilateral extradition agreements with the US, such as France and Poland.
- Mehmet Atilla: Mehmet Hakan Atilla, a Turkish banker, was deported from the United States to Turkey in 2018. He faced charges related to a scheme to evade US sanctions against Iran.
Non-extradition
- Edward Snowden: Former US National Security Agency (NSA) contractor Edward Snowden exposed classified information about global surveillance programs. To stop extradition to the United States, Snowden sought asylum in Russia, a country that does not have an extradition agreement with the US. As of the latest information available, he remains in Russia.
- Carlos Ghosn: Carlos Ghosn, the former chairman of the Nissan-Renault-Mitsubishi alliance, faced charges of financial misconduct in Japan. In a dramatic escape, Ghosn fled to Lebanon, which does not have an extradition agreement with Japan. He continues to reside in Lebanon, beyond the reach of Japanese authorities.
- Kim Dotcom: Internet entrepreneur Kim Dotcom, the founder of the file-sharing website Megaupload, faced calls for extradition from the United States on copyright infringement and racketeering charges. However, Dotcom fought the extradition in New Zealand courts and ultimately avoided extradition.
These cases highlight the intricate legal battles, diplomatic discussions, and political considerations involved in extradition matters. It is important to note that decisions on extradition can vary depending on the specific circumstances, the countries involved, and the legal frameworks in place.
Seeking refuge in a non-extradition country does not guarantee absolute protection, as political variables and diplomatic relations can change over time, potentially impacting decisions on extradition.
How Can Global Citizen Solutions Help You?
Global Citizen Solutions is a boutique migration consultancy firm with years of experience delivering bespoke residence and citizenship by investment solutions for international families. With offices worldwide and an experienced, hands-on team, we have helped hundreds of clients worldwide acquire citizenship, residence visas, or homes while diversifying their portfolios with robust investments.
We guide you from start to finish, taking you beyond your citizenship or residency by investment application.
Frequently Asked Questions about Without Non-Extradition Countries
Which countries can you not be extradited?
Some countries without extradition treaties include Russia, China, Brunei, Montenegro, Ukraine, Moldova, Vietnam, Cambodia, Mongolia, Qatar, Bahrain, Ethiopia, Botswana, and Uganda.
Why do some countries have no official extradition treaty?
Governments may choose not to have extradition treaties for various reasons, including concerns about the fairness of the legal system of the country, political considerations, protection of their own citizens, or disagreement with the death penalty.
What is the safest country if you want to prevent extradition?
Some countries where you may have a lower risk of extradition include Russia, China, Brunei, Montenegro, Ukraine, Moldova, Vietnam, Cambodia, Mongolia, the UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, Ethiopia, Botswana, and Uganda.
What is the best country if you want to prevent extradition?
The UAE is considered one of the best countries to prevent extradition due to its robust legal system, stringent privacy laws, and the absence of existing extradition treaties with certain countries, such as the US. The UAE has a reputation for upholding the rule of law and ensuring a fair judicial process.
Furthermore, the UAE is characterized by geopolitical stability and a diplomatic approach that avoids entanglement in major political disputes. This absence of political conflicts contributes to the country’s overall security and may mitigate the likelihood of requests for extradition being influenced by external political pressures.
Does Belize extradite to the US?
Yes, Belize has an extradition treaty with the United States. This means that Belize can extradite people to the United States to face criminal charges if requested by the US government and if the extradition request meets the requirements outlined in the treaty and Belizean law.
Does Dubai extradite to the US?
Yes, Dubai, as part of the UAE, has extradition treaties with several countries, including the United States.
Does Switzerland extradite to the US?
Yes, Switzerland has extradition treaties with numerous countries, including the United States. This means that Switzerland can extradite people to the United States to face criminal charges if requested by the US government and if the extradition request meets the requirements outlined in the treaty and Swiss law.
What countries have no extradition to UK?
The UK does not have formal extradition treaties with countries like North Korea, Somalia, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Syria, Algeria, Libya, and Iraq.
Are non-extradition countries safe for foreigners?
Non-extradition countries are not inherently safe for foreigners. While they may avoid extradition, local laws, political instability, corruption, and case-by-case cooperation with other nations can pose significant risks.
Can you obtain citizenship in a non-extradition country?
Yes, you can obtain citizenship in a non-extradition country, but the process depends on the specific country’s laws and requirements. Some non-extradition countries offer citizenship through investment, naturalization, marriage, or descent. However, each country has its own criteria and due diligence processes, especially for foreigners seeking citizenship.
Are non-extradition countries safe for foreigners?
Non-extradition countries are not inherently safe for foreigners. While they may offer some protection from being extradited to another country, they still pose risks such as strict local laws, political instability, and potential cooperation with other nations on a case-by-case basis. It is important to consider these factors when evaluating safety in non-extradition countries.
