Home > Reports > Global Education Report: Full Report

Global Education Report: Full Report

Introduction

In the 21st century, the dynamics of higher education have been significantly shaped by increased student mobility. This report, “Global Education Report: Full Report,” delves into the evolving landscape of international student movement, exploring the factors that influence students’ decisions to study abroad. It examines the trends, motivations, and destinations of international students, highlighting the growing importance of cross-border education in fostering cultural exchange, global competitiveness, and economic growth. This report also looks at the rising costs of higher education, and where wealthy students choose to study.

Mapping the Future: Where Students Are Moving for Higher Education

In the 21st century, the mobility of students for higher education has emerged as a dynamic and influential factor in global education systems. According to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), over 6 million students studied abroad in 2023, a number that is expected to grow to more than 10 million by 2030 (chart below).1 This trend reflects the increasing importance of cross-border education for fostering cultural exchange, global competitiveness, and economic growth.

gcs-GER-FR-img-1

The global landscape of student mobility has expanded significantly over the past decade, with students increasingly seeking international higher education not only for academic excellence, research opportunities, and diverse career prospects.1 The UNESCO Global Education Monitoring Report highlights that international students increasingly seek institutions with strong global reputations, rigorous academic programs, and post-graduation work visa opportunities. However, beyond education standards and career prospects, students are increasingly looking for  destinations that offer a higher quality of life and the opportunity to immerse themselves in diverse and enriching cultural experiences. This trend highlights the need to consider both the financial and experiential aspects of studying abroad, as students balance costs with opportunities for personal and professional growth in a globalized world.

The growth of international student enrollment, as shown in the chart above, has been resilient even amidst global challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic. The European Commission (2023) projects that by 2026, the number of internationally mobile students will grow by approximately 20% as countries continue to recover and adjust their visa policies to attract foreign talent.2 This aligns with research by QS Intelligence Unit, which finds that students’ preferences are shifting toward countries with flexible immigration policies and support systems for international students.3

The chart illustrates that while the total number of higher education students is projected to see a slight decline in the coming years, the trend for international student enrollment tells a different story. Despite the predicted decrease in overall student numbers, the proportion of international students continues to rise steadily. This suggests that even as domestic enrollment may face challenges, institutions are increasingly attracting students from abroad. The sustained growth in international students highlights their important role in higher education systems worldwide, reinforcing the importance of global mobility and the demand for cross-border educational opportunities.

The steady rise in international student enrolment isn’t just about global mobility. It’s also vital for universities’ financial health and the economies of host countries.  As illustrated in the latest data (chart below), countries like the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia generate substantial revenue—exceeding $40 billion, $30 billion, and $25 billion respectively—from international students in 2023 alone.

gcs-GER-FR-img-2

These financial inflows go beyond tuition fees, encompassing living expenses, travel, and other expenditures that stimulate local economies. For universities, international students provide a vital revenue stream that supports academic programs, research initiatives, and campus infrastructure, especially in a time when domestic enrollment may be shrinking. Attracting international students is thus as strategy higher education institutions use to offset budget shortfalls, maintain high educational standards, and continue investing in innovation.

The United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, France and Germany remain the top destinations for international students, driven by their world-renowned universities, research infrastructure, and good career prospects.4 In Europe, apart from the above mentioned countries, Sweden, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Italy and more recently Spain and Portugal are also nations that host top university and attract global students, due to their high quality of life and affordability compared to other European destinations.

In the Asia-Pacific region, China, Japan and South Korea stand out as major hubs for international education. Additionally, the UAE has become a prominent destination for international students due to its rapid development in technology, modern infrastructure, and global connectivity

According to UNESCO, international student mobility remains highly concentrated in English-speaking and economically developed nations in the Global North, with the United States (900,000), the United Kingdom (around 500,000), Canada (over 400,000), and Australia (roughly 400,000) in the lead. In Europe, Germany and France each attract between 300,000 and 500,000 students, reinforcing the region’s strong academic reputation and affordability compared to the U.S.

Although data suggests that English-speaking and developed nations continue to dominate as preferred destinations for international students, emerging economies in Asia are gaining prominence due to investment in technology and research, expanding educational infrastructure, and global outreach initiatives. China, now hosting approximately 500,000 international students, has become a major competitor, while Japan, South Korea, and Singapore each welcome over 100,000 students, reflecting their growing appeal. This shift indicates a diversification in global education mobility, where students are increasingly considering not only academic prestige but also affordability, technological advancements, and regional job market integration when choosing their study destinations.

gcs-GER-FR-img-3

When analyzing origin nations, countries like China and India dominate in terms of the number of students going abroad for higher education, with over a million outbound students from China alone (chart below). According to UNESCO, China and India together account for more than a third of the world’s internationally mobile students.5 This significant outflow is driven by several factors, including the growing middle class in these countries, the perceived quality of education abroad, and the intense competition for limited spots in top domestic universities.6 Additionally, families in these countries view higher education as a vital pathway to social advancement and global mobility. They are willing to invest significant resources to secure degrees from prestigious international institutions, where students gain not only a top-tier education but also valuable networking opportunities with influential world leaders and professionals.7

gcs-GER-FR-img-4

Demographically, most of these outbound students fall within the 18-24 age range, predominantly pursuing undergraduate and postgraduate degrees in fields like STEM, business, and finance. According to the Institute of International Education (IIE), around 45% of international students from China and India pursue STEM-related programs8 due to better job prospects and higher salary expectations upon graduation. The European Commission notes that these students are also attracted by the opportunity to gain work experience in countries like U.S., Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom9, which have favorable post-graduation work visa policies. This aligns with findings from the QS Intelligence Unit, which highlights that access to work opportunities is a significant motivator for international students, alongside the desire to experience different cultures and lifestyles.10

Beyond academic aspirations, the motivations of these students are closely tied to economic and career considerations. For many, studying abroad is not just about gaining a quality education but also serves as a pathway to better career prospects and, in some cases, permanent residency in a more developed country. According to the Association of International Educators, over 60% of international students from India express an intention to remain in their host country after graduation, driven by higher salaries, career growth opportunities, and an improved quality of life.11 These students are also driven by the promise of a globally recognized degree, which can give them a competitive edge in both domestic and international job markets. However, this trend also highlights challenges within their home countries, such as limited higher education capacity, rising unemployment rates, and rigid labor markets, which may not fully accommodate skilled graduates.12

This shift in global mobility creates opportunities for institutions, host societies, and students. Host countries gain cultural diversity, talent, and economic growth, enriching academia and driving innovation. Higher education institutions can leverage this influx of international students to foster global partnerships, enhance research collaboration, and expand their global reputation. For students, studying abroad offers access to world-class education, exposure to diverse cultures, and valuable professional networks that can enhance their global career prospects.

Moreover, in an increasingly interconnected world, international education serves as a bridge for cross-cultural understanding, global cooperation, and knowledge exchange. Host societies gain from the diverse perspectives international students bring, contributing to more inclusive and dynamic communities. Educational institutions can also tailor programs and support services to better integrate international students, maximizing mutual benefits and fostering long-term global connections.

In the next section, we will explore how institutions and host societies can further capitalize on these opportunities and implement strategies to support and enhance the international student experience.

Global Exchange: How International Students Enrich Universities, Societies, and Economies Worldwide

gcs-GER-FR-img-5

The influx of international students significantly boosts the economies of host countries. According to the OECD, international students contribute billions of dollars annually through tuition fees, living expenses, and other spending.13 In the United States, for instance, the National Association of Foreign Student Advisers (NAFSA) reported that international students contributed nearly $33 billion to the economy during the 2022-2023 academic year, supporting over 400,000 jobs.14 Beyond direct financial input, the spending patterns of international students create a ripple effect, benefiting local businesses and generating tax revenues that strengthen public services.

This demography plays a pivotal role in enhancing the academic landscape of receiving countries. They bring diverse perspectives that enrich classroom discussions, stimulate critical thinking, and foster innovation. Research published in Higher Education journal highlights that diverse academic environments contribute to better problem-solving and creative approaches, benefiting both domestic students and institutions.15 Additionally, many international students engage in research projects, especially in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics), fields, where their contributions lead to groundbreaking discoveries and advancements.16 The influx of international talent thus helps universities remain competitive on the global stage, raising their rankings and research output.

Countries facing demographic challenges and skills shortages benefit significantly from the presence of international students. The European Commission has identified international graduates as a crucial source of skilled labor, especially in aging societies like Germany and Japan.17 By providing pathways to post-graduate work visas, these countries attract and retain top talent, effectively filling gaps in key sectors such as healthcare, engineering, and information technology. According to a report by the Australian Department of Home Affairs, nearly 20% of international graduates transition to permanent residency, strengthening the workforce with skilled talent and diversity, which fuels innovation and economic resilience.18

Additionally, international students act as cultural ambassadors, fostering mutual understanding and social cohesion in their host countries. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) emphasizes that cultural exchange between international students and local communities promotes tolerance and intercultural dialogue.19 Through student organizations, cultural festivals, and community engagement, international students help break down stereotypes and build bridges across cultures. This cultural integration not only enriches the social fabric of host nations but also prepares local students for global careers in an increasingly interconnected world.

The presence of international students also strengthens diplomatic relations between countries, contributing to what is often referred to as “soft power.” According to a study by the British Council, countries that welcome international students build lasting ties with future leaders who may later occupy influential positions in their home countries.20 Many influential global leaders have benefited immensely from studying abroad, gaining not only academic knowledge but also valuable international networks and a broader understanding of global issues. Kofi Annan, former Secretary-General of the United Nations from Ghana, studied at Macalester College in the United States and the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Switzerland. His international education exposed him to diverse cultures and diplomatic environments, shaping his global leadership and peacekeeping strategies. Similarly, Aung San Suu Kyi, a prominent political leader from Myanmar, studied at Oxford University in the United Kingdom, where she developed strong international connections and a deep understanding of democratic principles, which later fueled her political activism. In the business world, leaders like Sundar Pichai, CEO of Alphabet and Google, studied at Stanford University and the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania after moving from India. His exposure to Silicon Valley’s innovative ecosystem provided him with vital professional networks and insights into global technology trends. Likewise, Elon Musk, originally from South Africa, studied at Queen’s University in Canada and the University of Pennsylvania in the U.S., where he built a network that helped launch his entrepreneurial ventures. These experiences highlight how international education fosters cultural adaptability, global thinking, and strategic relationships that are crucial for impactful leadership in today’s interconnected world.

Several countries leverage international scholarship programs to enhance their global influence through higher education and cultural exchange. The Fulbright Program by the U.S. Department of State promotes mutual understanding by funding academic exchanges worldwide. Similarly, the Chevening Scholarships (U.K.) and the Erasmus+ Program (European Union) foster global networks and strengthen diplomatic ties by supporting international study and collaboration. Germany’s DAAD Scholarships and France’s Eiffel Excellence Scholarship attract global talent to their universities, bolstering their academic and research leadership. Japan’s MEXT Scholarship and China’s Confucius Institute Scholarships advance cultural diplomacy by promoting language and cultural studies. Additionally, programs like Australia’s Destination Australia Program, Canada’s Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarships, New Zealand’s Scholarships for Developing Countries, and the Russian Government Scholarships serve as strategic tools for soft power, expanding international partnerships and promoting national interests through education.

Lastly, the long-term benefits of hosting international students extend beyond immediate economic gains. Graduates who remain in the host country contribute to innovation, entrepreneurship, and knowledge transfer. According to a report by the Canadian Bureau for International Education (CBIE), nearly 60% of international graduates in Canada expressed interest in staying permanently, driven by the country’s inclusive immigration policies.21

In conclusion, the contributions of international students extend far beyond the walls of universities—they are catalysts for positive change across multiple dimensions of society. From driving economic growth in host countries to enriching the cultural fabric and enhancing academic environments, their impact is both profound and enduring. By bridging cultures, they foster global understanding and build stronger diplomatic ties that last a lifetime. At the same time, they help address critical labour shortages, particularly in aging economies, by bringing much-needed skills and fresh perspectives. Their influence also extends to their peers, who gain a richer, more diverse learning experience that prepares them for a globalized world. Meanwhile, sending countries benefit from knowledge and skills that return home, fuelling local development. Ultimately, international students are not just visitors, they are contributors, innovators, and bridge-builders who leave a lasting legacy that benefits us all.

The Rising Costs of Higher Education: The Most Expensive Countries Over the Last 30 Years

Higher education has long served as a pathway to career advancement and intellectual growth, but over the past thirty years, its financial burden has soared, particularly in nations like the United States and the United Kingdom. These countries, renowned for hosting some of the world’s most prestigious institutions, have become emblematic of the rising costs associated with pursuing higher education.

gcs-GER-FR-img-6

Moreover, international students face financial challenges beyond tuition inflation, as the cost of living significantly impacts their budgets. Expenses such as housing, transportation, and groceries will add up, particularly in cities with large student populations like London, Sydney, New York and Toronto. For instance, housing shortages and high rental costs in urban centers exacerbate financial pressures, while transportation expenses and rising food prices further strain student finances.

The United States consistently ranks as the most expensive destination for higher education not only for international students, but local enrolees also struggle to pay tuition fees in most private universities. Private institutions such as Harvard, Stanford, and MIT charge annual tuition fees ranging from $30,000 to $70,000. Even public universities have high tuition rates for international students, averaging $25,000 per year. Coupled with a high cost of living in cities like New York and Los Angeles, where annual expenses can range between $15,000 and $25,000, studying in the U.S. becomes a significant financial undertaking.

A major factor driving the high costs of U.S. higher education is tuition inflation. From 2010 to 2023, tuition at public four-year institutions increased by 36.7%, with an average annual inflation rate of 3.63%. This is a continuation of a decades-long trend: since 1963, tuition at public colleges has increased by 197.4% after adjusting for inflation. The most extreme decade for tuition inflation was the 1980s, when prices rose by a staggering 9.16%.22 Students and families must navigate a complex landscape of grants, loans, and rising tuition rates, which have outpaced both wages and general inflation.

Consequently, student debt is a critical issue in the U.S. As of 2024, the total student loan debt in the country exceeds $1.6 trillion, with over 45 million borrowers.23 According to the Education Data Initiative, the average student loan borrower owes around $37,000.22 The skyrocketing costs and reliance on loans have made higher education a financial burden for many families, with repayment timelines often stretching into decades. The Bennett Hypothesis, proposed by former U.S. Secretary of Education William J. Bennett in 1987, suggests that federal financial aid allows colleges to raise tuition as students become less price-sensitive. Some studies support this hypothesis, particularly in the for-profit sector, where institutions significantly increased tuition in response to expanded federal aid.24 However, contrary evidence highlights minimal effects in other areas of higher education, such as professional programs, indicating that tuition inflation is driven by more complex factors.25 The mixed findings suggest that while financial aid may influence tuition prices, its role is part of a broader set of economic and policy dynamics.

Canada has emerged as a more cost-effective option for international students who wish to relocate to North America but find the United States too expensive. With its high-quality education system, strong economy, and safe environment, Canada continues to attract thousands of international students annually. Tuition fees for international students typically range from CA$20,000 to CA$50,000 ($15,000 to $37,000) per year, depending on the institution and program, which is generally more affordable than the high tuition fees in the U.S. Additionally, the cost of living in Canada is lower than in major U.S. cities like New York and San Francisco, with annual living expenses falling between CA$15,000 and CA$20,000 ($11,000 to $15,000). While tuition has steadily increased due to rising operational costs and limited government subsidies 26 the overall financial burden remains more manageable compared to the U.S.

Beyond affordability, Canada’s immigration policies make it an attractive destination for international students looking for long-term residency options. The Post-Graduation Work Permit (PGWP) allows graduates to gain Canadian work experience for up to three years, often serving as a stepping stone to permanent residency through the Express Entry system. This makes Canada particularly appealing for students who want to study, work, and settle in North America without facing the stringent visa restrictions and high costs associated with U.S. universities.

The UK continues to be a top destination for international students, home to prestigious institutions such as Oxford, Cambridge, and Imperial College London. However, the rising cost of education and living expenses poses a growing challenge for both students and universities. Tuition fees for international students range between £10,000 and £38,000 ($12,000–$47,000) per year, with London being one of the most expensive cities for students, where annual living costs exceed £18,000 ($22,000).

Government policy changes, particularly the 2012 tuition cap increase, have significantly impacted students, especially those from outside the EU that pay international fees. Despite a recent government decision to increase tuition fees by 3.1% to £9,535 for 2025/26, the real value of fees has been steadily eroded by inflation, leading to financial strain on universities.27 Reports indicate that 40% of UK universities are now running at a deficit, with institutions like Durham and Cardiff announcing budget cuts, staff reductions, and course closures to cope with financial pressures.28

Beyond tuition, inflation remains a key issue affecting students and universities alike. The real funding per student has declined due to the tuition fee freeze, forcing universities to operate with fewer resources while maintaining quality education. Meanwhile, students face increasing financial burdens, with an average loan debt nearing £50,000 upon graduation.29 Since student loan balances are indexed to inflation, a sustained rise in inflation could significantly increase student debt, leading to growing concerns about affordability and long-term financial stability. There are raising fears that the UK’s global reputation in higher education could suffer if financial instability leads to declining teaching quality.

Australia has become a popular destination for international students, but it comes with a hefty price tag too. Tuition fees range from AU$20,000 to AU$45,000 ($13,000 to $30,000) per year. Additionally, living expenses in major cities like Sydney and Melbourne are among the highest globally, averaging AU$20,000 to AU$25,000 ($13,000 to $17,000) annually. The Australian Department of Education’s 2022 report found that international student enrollment has driven up tuition fees, while housing shortages in urban centers exacerbate living costs.

Switzerland offers some of the best educational opportunities in Europe, with institutions like ETH Zurich ranking among the world’s top universities. While public universities charge relatively modest tuition fees (CHF 1,000–4,000 per year), private institutions’ fees can exceed CHF 50,000 ($55,000). Living costs in cities like Zurich and Geneva are also significant, averaging CHF 18,000–28,000 ($20,000–30,000) annually. According to a 2020 study published in the European Journal of Higher Education, the combination of high-quality education and Switzerland’s strong economy makes it a premium yet costly choice for students.

For many families, the rising costs of higher education in countries like the U.S. and the UK have made international relocation an appealing solution. Countries such as Germany, Norway, and the Netherlands offer tuition-free or low-cost education, even for international students, and boast lower living costs compared to traditional study destinations. According to a 2023 OECD report, Germany attracts over 400,000 international students annually, with many citing affordability as a primary reason for choosing the country.30 Similarly, Nordic countries like Norway provide free education at public universities, with students only needing to cover living expenses, which are often subsidized. This trend highlights the increasing willingness of families to move abroad to ensure their children can access quality education without incurring substantial debt. These cost-effective options not only relieve financial stress but also offer students exposure to diverse cultures and global career opportunities.

While prestige remains an important factor when choosing a university and study destination, affordability and tuition fees have become critical considerations, especially when evaluating the long-term financial health of international students. The rising costs of higher education in top-ranking universities in the U.S. and U.K. have made many families reconsider whether the prestige of an institution outweighs the burden of high tuition fees, student loans, and living expenses. As financial sustainability becomes a priority, more families are seeking affordable and cost-effective alternatives, opting for countries like Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, and Nordic nations, where students can access high-quality education without accumulating excessive debt. This shift highlights the growing importance of balancing academic excellence with financial feasibility, ensuring that international students can pursue global opportunities without compromising their economic future.

When Cost is Not an Issue: Where the Wealthy Choose to Attend University

For high-net-worth individuals (HNWIs) and their families, selecting the right university is an investment that goes beyond just academics. While cost may be a limiting factor for many, for the ultra-wealthy, it’s about leveraging education for strategic advantages, global influence, and long-term opportunities. The traditional academic powerhouses in the United States and United Kingdom continue to attract affluent families, but increasingly, countries like China, Singapore, France, and India are stepping into the spotlight as top destinations for those who can afford the best.

In the United States, Ivy League schools such as Harvard, Stanford, and MIT remain among the most sought-after institutions by wealthy families. These universities are not only renowned for their academic rigor but also for their influential networks and career-shaping opportunities. According to the QS World University Rankings, Harvard and Stanford rank 4th and 3rd respectively, which underscores their global appeal.31 Beyond academics, these universities offer experiential learning through internships, research projects, and international exchanges.

Similarly, the United Kingdom holds its ground with prestigious institutions like Oxford and Cambridge, which consistently top global rankings. Oxford was ranked 1st in the Times Higher Education World University Rankings 2024, with Cambridge close behind at 5th place.32 For wealthy families, the appeal of Oxbridge is tied to its historical prestige, personalized tutorials, and a collegiate system that fosters deep academic engagement. Even with uncertainties introduced by Brexit and stricter immigration policies, international students remain a significant economic force, contributing approximately £41.9 billion to the UK economy in 2021/22.33 These factors make the UK also a compelling option, particularly for families who value a globally recognized education paired with robust networking opportunities.

The families that send students from China and India to study abroad are often from the upper-middle class or affluent segments of society. According to a report by the British Council, the majority of outbound students from China and India come from households in the top 10-20% income bracket.6 These families have the financial means to afford substantial tuition fees and living expenses abroad, which can range between $30,000 to $50,000 per year, depending on the country and institution. A study by HSBC revealed that Chinese parents, on average, spend up to $70,000 per year on their children’s education abroad, covering costs like tuition, accommodation, and other expenses.34 Similarly, in India, families view international education as a significant investment in their children’s future, often prioritizing it over other major expenditures like real estate or luxury goods.35 According to the Institute of International Education, around 60% of Indian families sending students abroad have annual household incomes exceeding $100,000.8 These families typically consist of high-income professionals, business owners, or individuals working in industries like finance, technology, and manufacturing. Many of these families view international education as not just an academic opportunity, but also a way to secure global career prospects, social mobility, and even potential pathways to citizenship in Western countries.

Moreover, this trend is fueled by cultural factors where families prioritize education as a pathway to success. In China, it is common for parents to save diligently for years to ensure their children can attend prestigious universities abroad. The rising number of high-net-worth individuals in these countries further drives this trend. According to a report by Hurun, China has seen a steady increase in the number of millionaires, with education for their children being a top priority.36 This aligns with data from NAFSA, which notes that international students from affluent families contribute significantly to the economies of host countries, spending not just on education but also on housing, travel, and luxury goods during their stay.11 In 2022 alone, international students contributed $38 billion to the US economy, according to the Institute of International Education, highlighting the country’s continued magnetism despite increasing tuition costs and visa hurdles.37

Even when cost is not a limiting factor, the dominance of traditional Western institutions in the U.S. and the U.K. is being increasingly challenged by emerging academic hubs in Europe and Asia, which offer not only world-class education but also strategic advantages in global business, innovation, and geopolitical positioning. For HNWIs and elite students and their families, prestige is not solely defined by Ivy League or Oxbridge credentials but by access to dynamic economies, cutting-edge research environments, influential global networks and quality of life indicators.

Europe’s historical and cultural richness, combine with its top-tier business schools. France, for example, is not only home to historic universities like the Sorbonne but also to globally acclaimed business schools such as INSEAD. Located in Fontainebleau, INSEAD ranks 3rd globally in the Financial Times Masters in Management38 and is renowned for its diverse student body and focus on leadership. For families with business interests, INSEAD offers more than just an education; it provides unparalleled networking with future industry leaders and access to the vibrant European market.

Although China is better known for exporting international students, its rapid rise in the education sector is now attracting significant attention. With institutions like Tsinghua and Peking University now ranked among the top 20 globally32, China is becoming an academic powerhouse. These universities excel in STEM fields, making them particularly attractive for students interested in technology and innovation. Tsinghua and Peking universities are increasingly attracting a diverse body of international students. As of 2022, Tsinghua University hosted over 5,000 international students from 133 countries39, while Peking University welcomed more than 1,100 international students from over 100 countries in 2024.40 Most of these students come from neighboring Asian countries, particularly South Korea, Japan, Pakistan, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, and Indonesia. This strong regional representation highlights China’s strategic appeal within Asia due to geographical proximity, cultural ties, and regional economic partnerships.

Beyond Asians, both universities have increasing numbers of students from North America and Europe, particularly from the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany.39 Additionally, there is notable representation from countries in the Middle East, such as Iran, and from Russia, indicating China’s expanding educational influence in Eurasia.41 This diverse student body not only enhances the internationalization of Chinese universities but also strengthens China’s soft power by fostering cross-cultural exchanges and global academic collaboration.

For HNWIs, the appeal of China lies not only in its world-class education but also in its strategic economic position. As the second-largest economy globally, with a GDP of approximately $17.8 trillion in 202342, China offers students a unique opportunity to build connections and gain insights into one of the fastest-growing markets. The country’s higher education sector has seen significant growth, with over 3,000 universities and a gross enrollment ratio reaching 60.2% in 2023.43 In 2018, China hosted 492,185 international students44, marking a consistent increase in global enrollments and reinforcing its status as a leading international education hub. However, the COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted this upward trend, leading to a sharp decline in international student mobility. By 2021, the number of full-time international students in China had dropped to approximately 255,720, representing a 23% decrease and accounting for less than 1% of the country’s total student population.45 In response to this decline, China is actively working to restore pre-pandemic enrolment levels by strengthening international partnerships, enhancing academic programs, and easing travel restrictions to attract global talent back to its universities.

Singapore has also established itself as a key player in higher education. The country has demonstrated a strong and consistent growth in international student enrollment, solidifying its status as a leading global education hub. In 2021, Singapore hosted approximately 59,100 international students, which increased by 10% to 65,400 in 2022.46 This upward trend accelerated in 2023, with international student pass holders rising sharply to around 79,300, marking a significant 25% increase from the previous year.47 A significant portion of these students originate from neighboring nations such as Malaysia, Indonesia, China, and India.48 While updated revenue data is unavailable, the international education sector contributed about SGD 1.2 billion (USD 880 million) in 2019. With continued growth, its economic impact has likely increased, further cementing Singapore’s status as a top destination for higher education and global talent development. The National University of Singapore (NUS) and Nanyang Technological University (NTU) consistently rank among the top 20 universities worldwide49, with NUS holding the 8th position in the QS World University Rankings.31 Singapore’s focus on innovation, coupled with its safe, multicultural environment, attracts students from across the globe. For families seeking both quality education and stability, Singapore offers an ideal combination, especially with its favourable post-graduation work policies that allow students to seamlessly transition into the workforce.

India is another emerging destination that is capturing the interest of HNWIs. Institutions like the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) and Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs) are becoming globally recognized for their rigorous focus on engineering, technology, and management. IIT Bombay, for instance, is ranked 118th in the QS World University Rankings.31 India’s higher education sector has seen significant growth in international student enrollment, reflecting its rising status as a global educational hub. According to the All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE) 2021–22, India hosted 46,878 international students from 170 countries50, a notable increase from previous years. Key source countries include Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Tanzania, and Sudan. Between 2016 and 2021, over 333,000 international students pursued higher education in India51, highlighting its growing global appeal. This influx contributes significantly to the economy through tuition fees, job creation, and cultural exchange, although international students still represent a small fraction of India’s 43.3 million higher education students.52

As the global higher education landscape continues to evolve, English-speaking and economically developed countries like the U.S., the U.K., Canada, and nations across Europe still dominate as preferred destinations for international students. However, wealthy families are increasingly expanding their horizons beyond these traditional institutions, seeking diverse and emerging educational opportunities in non-traditional destinations that offer competitive academic programs, cultural enrichment, and strategic career advantages. The rise of academic excellence in China, Singapore, France, and India offers new avenues for students to gain not only a top-tier education but also access to markets and industries that align with their families’ long-term goals. For HNWIs, choosing the right university is about much more than securing a degree—it’s about investing in a future where connections, networks, and strategic geographic locations are just as valuable as academic credentials. Whether it’s the prestige of an Ivy League institution, the historical legacy of Oxbridge, or the cutting-edge programs of INSEAD, these decisions are carefully made with an eye on global influence and future success.

In today’s interconnected world, choosing the right country for higher education has become an impactful decision that shapes student’s academic journey, career trajectory and personal development. This choice goes beyond selecting a university; it involves weighing factors such as quality of life, economic costs and opportunities, cultural adaptability, and long-term career prospects. For families, this process can be daunting, but research and expert advice reveal key criteria that can guide students toward making the most strategic choice.53 The Global Education Report examines the key factors that international students and their families should consider when choosing an educational destination. It provides a comprehensive analysis of academic opportunities, societal conditions, and economic factors to help guide them toward the most suitable choice.

01/

The Academic Landscape

Academic excellence and universities reputation lies at the core of higher education, with university reputation and rankings offering students a competitive edge. Leading rankings, such as the Times Higher Education, provide insights into institutions based on factors like research quality, faculty caliber, and international reputation. Yet these metrics only capture part of the broader landscape. Other essential motivations—such as research quality, career prospects, diversity and inclusion, and future earning potential—play a significant role in decision-making. While some of these factors are closely tied to specific universities, others, particularly career opportunities, inclusivity, and earning potential, are also influenced by the broader economic and social context of the country where the institution is located. Rankings, therefore, are invaluable tools that assist students and families in navigating the academic landscape, identifying institutions that excel in their fields, and understanding the educational environment within each country.

Moreover, choosing a country for higher education involves more than just educational related subjects. Factors such as cost of living, quality of life, employability, language, and cultural adaptability are equally vital. A country may house a prestigious university with top scores in research output, but if the surrounding environment doesn’t support the student’s financial needs, cultural preferences, career goals, and quality of life standards the experience may fall short of expectations. Thus, families and students must look beyond the numbers to create a well-rounded view of what each country truly offers, ensuring their choice aligns not only with academic aspirations but also with personal well-being and future ambitions. This shift is evident in the declining international enrollment rates at UK and US universities over the past year. While these countries still host many top-ranking institutions, recent data from the QS World University Rankings reveals lower scores for international student and faculty representation.54

This decline comes as universities in these countries face challenges in attracting and retaining international talent—a core indicator of institutional diversity and global engagement. While the US and UK have historically been the top choices for international students, with prestigious institutions and opportunities for global networking, the recent trend points to growing obstacles for these institutions. Concerns over post-graduation work restrictions, particularly in the UK, and visa denial rates in the US have been cited as primary deterrents.55 Additionally, economic uncertainties and policy shifts like Brexit have added layers of unpredictability, impacting students’ decisions to commit to long-term educational and career paths in these regions.56 Combined with the perception of increasingly hostile political climates, especially towards specific nationalities, these economic and social barriers are driving students to seek education in other parts of the world.

Countries like Canada57, Australia58, Germany59, the Netherlands60, New Zealand61, Sweden62, and Ireland63 are highly regarded for their supportive environments and affordable fees for international students. These nations not only host prestigious universities but also provide policies that ensure comprehensive healthcare, safety, post-graduation work opportunities, and pathways to residency, making them both appealing and accessible choices for global students.

02/

The Societal Climate: Quality of Life as an Essential Element

In today’s global education landscape, quality of life has become a key factor influencing students’ choices in selecting where to pursue higher education. Beyond academic prestige, career opportunities and income prospects, international students and their families are increasingly prioritizing the social, cultural, and economic environments of potential study destinations. Safety, healthcare, inclusivity, and a welcoming atmosphere are highly valued, reflecting the growing awareness of how these elements contribute to both personal well-being and academic success. Reports, such as the 2024 International Student Barometer (ISB), indicate that 78% of students place safety, healthcare, and social inclusiveness as top priorities63, underscoring a shift in what students expect from their study abroad experience.

The importance of quality of life is particularly evident in countries known for supportive social climates. Scandinavian nations, like Sweden, Finland, Norway and Denmark, consistently rank high on quality-of-life indicators, providing international students with secure, inclusive, and healthier environments. Canada’s emphasis on diversity and community support also makes it an appealing destination for students worldwide, with welcoming policies for students and pathways to permanent residency. In contrast, the UK and US, traditionally popular study destinations, face increasing scrutiny over issues of affordability, restrictive post-study work policies, and concerns over inclusivity, prompting students to consider alternatives that promise a more supportive environment.

Survey data highlights significant disparities in students’ experiences with social inclusiveness in their chosen study destinations. According to ISB’s 2023 data, international students in UK institutions continue to report discrimination, with marked differences among nationality groups. The study found that East and Southeast Asian (ESEA) students, especially those from China, experience higher rates of discrimination.64 In 2023, around 41% of Chinese students reported discrimination based on race, ethnicity, or nationality, an increase over previous years. This trend, initially linked to COVID-19 stigma, has persisted post-pandemic, indicating that broader societal issues may be at play. Such findings emphasize the need for students to consider the societal climate and inclusivity levels when choosing a study destination, as these factors can significantly affect their comfort and engagement on campus.

Experts highlight that quality of life factors are crucial to student success. It is often emphasized that a supportive social environment can significantly enhance a student’s academic experience, as families sometimes underestimate the importance of comfort and safety. These elements are considered foundational for academic and personal well-being. Experts further note that a positive and inclusive environment allows students to focus more effectively on their studies, manage stress better, and engage more actively in campus life.65 Moreover, quality of life influences academic performance indirectly by alleviating stressors related to safety, financial strain, and discrimination.

Parental perspectives also affirm the importance of social climate in the decision-making process. Many parents highlight that choosing a study destination with a strong sense of community and cultural diversity provides reassurance, as they value environments where their children will feel welcome and secure. This sense of comfort is often cited as a significant factor in selecting a country for higher education. Supportive environments with inclusive societies and comprehensive support systems are seen as offering a sense of belonging, which benefits students both academically and socially, making it easier for them to transition to a new cultural setting and concentrate on their studies.66

Ultimately, students and families are encouraged to consider countries with high quality of life, where safety, healthcare, and inclusivity are priorities. The social climate of a study destination can have a profound impact on a student’s academic performance and personal growth, fostering a more fulfilling and balanced educational experience. By researching aspects beyond academic rankings and focusing on environments that promote well-being and security, students can make more informed choices, ensuring that their study experience aligns with both their educational goals and overall.

03/

The Financial Map: Navigating Cost of Living and Tuition

As mentioned, when considering studying abroad, students and families often focus on the quality of education and reputation of institutions. However, another major factor significantly influencing the decision-making process is the cost of living and tuition fees. The financial demands of living abroad are substantial, often making or breaking a student’s study-abroad plans. Understanding these financial elements, from tuition costs to daily living expenses, is crucial for students to plan effectively and ensure a sustainable experience.

Tuition fees and cost of living vary widely across countries and cities. Research conducted by The Economist Intelligence Unit reveals that cost of living is often a determining factor, especially for students who lack substantial financial aid or scholarships.67 Cities like New York, London, and Sydney are known for world-renowned universities but rank among the most expensive cities in terms of rent, food, and general living expenses.68 In contrast, countries like Germany, Canada, and New Zealand provide more affordable options. For example, Germany offers public universities with low or even free tuition fees for both domestic and international students, a factor that has made the country a popular destination among budget-conscious students.

The contrast in costs becomes more evident when considering the long-term financial impact. In countries with high tuition fees and living costs, like the United States or the United Kingdom, students often rely heavily on loans, leading to debt that may take years to repay.69 In lower-cost destinations, students have more flexibility to manage their finances without incurring significant debt. Therefore, families need to evaluate not only the tuition but also the associated costs of living when choosing a destination for higher education.

When navigating the financial demands of studying abroad, advice from financial planners can be invaluable. Experts recommend families to consider the total financial picture, not just tuition. Factoring in daily expenses, housing, and transportation gives a realistic understanding of the total cost of studying abroad.69 Similarly, students from middle-income countries tend to focus on destinations where they can gain a quality education while avoiding excessive debt.

Countries in Europe, such as Germany, France, and the Netherlands, offer a range of financial advantages, including access to scholarships and lower living costs compared to cities in North America or the UK. Additionally, many universities in these countries provide options for students to work part-time while studying70, enabling them to supplement their income and reduce dependency on family support. Scholarships, grants, and other forms of financial aid can play a critical role in making international education more accessible. Many countries offer scholarships specifically for international students, often funded by government programs or educational institutions. For instance, Erasmus+71, a European Union initiative, provides grants to students from participating countries, covering tuition and living expenses. Similarly, the Fulbright Program72 in the United States offers scholarships that help alleviate the financial burden on international students, covering tuition, living expenses, and even health insurance. In addition to government scholarships, universities and private organizations offer financial aid to international students based on merit or need.73

When planning for higher education abroad, families should take a comprehensive approach that includes tuition costs, day-to-day living expenses, and additional unforeseen expenses. A few strategies that families can consider include:

Evaluating Scholarship Opportunities: Researching scholarships and grants available in the chosen study destination can drastically reduce the financial load. Government and university-sponsored scholarships can make a significant difference, especially in countries with high tuition fees.
Creating a Detailed Budget: A monthly budget that includes costs such as housing, food, transportation, and personal expenses can provide clarity on how much students will need. It’s also important to account for currency fluctuations and possible cost increases over time.
Exploring Work-Study Options: In many countries, international students can work part-time during their studies. For example, in Australia, students can work up to 20 hours per week, helping them cover part of their living expenses and gain valuable work experience.
Choosing Affordable Destinations: While countries like the US and UK are popular, families can also consider more affordable options in Europe and Asia, where the cost of living and tuition are lower, but the quality of education remains high.

In conclusion, while quality of education remains a priority, the cost of living and tuition fees are increasingly influencing where students choose to study. Families that approach these decisions with a clear financial map and realistic budget are better positioned to provide their children with the benefits of international education without compromising financial stability. By exploring scholarships, creating a comprehensive budget, and choosing destinations wisely, students and their families can embark on a sustainable and rewarding educational journey abroad.

04/

Career Peaks: Employability and Post-Graduation Salaries

When choosing a study destination, career prospects and employability are crucial factors for students and families who want assurance that their investment in education will yield a strong return. In a competitive global job market, selecting the right country can make a significant difference in terms of career opportunities and salary potential. According to a 2021 report by the OECD, countries like Switzerland, Australia, and Canada consistently rank high for graduate employability, particularly in industries facing skill shortages such as technology, healthcare, and engineering.74 These nations are attractive for students seeking not just an education but also long-term career stability and growth.

Switzerland, for instance, is well-known for its robust job market, especially in fields like finance, pharmaceuticals, and technology. The country’s strong economy, combined with high salaries and a stable work environment, makes it an appealing choice for graduates. According to the Global Competitiveness Report from the World Economic Forum75, Switzerland ranks among the top countries for innovation and productivity, which translates into high employability rates for graduates. Similarly, Australia attracts many international students due to its post-study work visa options, allowing graduates to gain practical experience and potentially secure permanent residency.

Canada is another attractive destination for students focused on employability. The country’s immigration-friendly policies and growing tech sector have made it a hub for international graduates seeking long-term careers. The Canada Immigration and Citizenship Report (2022) highlights that Canada’s Global Talent Stream program has accelerated the hiring of skilled workers, particularly in tech and engineering.76

The United States and Germany also offer strong career prospects for international students, especially in well-established industries such as engineering, healthcare, and finance. In the US, programs like the Optional Practical Training (OPT) allow graduates to work for up to three years in fields related to their degree. This flexibility, coupled with the country’s economic scale and diverse industries, makes it a favored choice for students aiming for high-paying jobs. Germany’s focus on research and development, particularly in the STEM sectors, provides graduates with ample job opportunities and competitive salaries. The country’s reputation for engineering excellence attracts students who are eager to build a career in fields such as automotive technology and renewable energy.

For students aiming for an international career, the key is to evaluate the employability landscape of their chosen study destination. Countries with strong job markets, high post-graduation salaries, and supportive visa policies provide a clear advantage in securing a successful future. As global industries evolve, students should focus on destinations that align with their career aspirations and the economic demand for their skills. By choosing countries that not only offer top-tier education but also strong post-graduation work opportunities, students can maximize their investment in higher education and set the stage for long-term professional success.

05/

Networks of Success: Alumni and Industry Connections

Building valuable networks and connections that can drive long-term career growth is key. In particular, countries with universities known for producing high-ranking CEOs and industry leaders offer students unique opportunities to create lasting professional relationships. According to a study published in The Journal of Higher Education, graduates from top-ranking institutions are 25% more likely to achieve executive roles within ten years of graduation, especially in fields like finance, technology, and law.77 This research highlights how the academic environment, combined with the networking opportunities at prestigious universities, significantly accelerates career progression.

Alumni networks are crucial for students focused on reaching executive or research-oriented career goals. As educational consultants recommend thar for students focused on research or executive careers, the right university can open doors. But families should also evaluate whether a university’s values and approach align with the student’s interests and learning style.78 The power of these networks is evident in the professional success of graduates who leverage these connections for mentorship, internships, and industry introductions. For instance, universities like Harvard, Stanford, and Oxford are renowned not just for their academic excellence but also for their strong alumni ties, which often translate into mentorship and career-defining opportunities for students.79

Research on the impact of alumni networks reveals that connections made during university can provide significant advantages in the job market. LinkedIn’s 2022 analysis of global CEOs shows that a large proportion of top executives graduated from prestigious institutions in the United States and the United Kingdom.80 These universities provide robust support systems through their alumni networks, enabling graduates to navigate their industries effectively. Alumni networks create career-defining connections. Universities with influential alumni can offer students invaluable support, from internships to high-level introductions in their industry.

France’s INSEAD exemplifies the effectiveness of strong alumni networks. The school is recognized for its global network of industry leaders, which provides students with invaluable insights and career opportunities. Many INSEAD graduates’ benefit from mentorship and connections that significantly advance their careers in business and management.81 The school’s focus on integrating students into its expansive network allows graduates to secure competitive roles in global corporations. This access to influential industry figures serves as a major advantage, especially in fields where strong connections are crucial for career progression.

Beyond job placements, alumni networks foster ongoing professional development and collaboration. Harvard University is one of the top institutions producing CEOs, with its graduates leading major corporations such as JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs.82 Harvard’s active alumni network enables continuous engagement through workshops, conferences, and networking events, which keep graduates connected to the latest industry trends and open new avenues for collaboration.83 Such support systems boost career trajectories and provide opportunities for lifelong learning.

Similarly, institutions like Stanford University and the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania are known for producing a significant number of CEOs worldwide.84 The strength of these networks lies not just in their size but in the quality of relationships cultivated among alumni. Graduates benefit from connecting with industry leaders who have navigated similar career paths, gaining insights that go beyond the classroom. Wharton, in particular, excels in helping graduates break into competitive sectors like finance and consulting, where having the right connections is crucial.

For students aspiring to careers in business, management, or finance, choosing a university with a strong alumni network can be transformative. These networks provide mentorship and doors to exclusive job opportunities, which can significantly improve career prospects. As competition in the global job market intensifies, leveraging alumni networks has become an essential strategy for achieving long-term success. According to the Graduate Management Admission Council85, over 60% of business graduates attribute their first job placements to connections made through their alumni networks, underscoring the importance of these relationships in navigating the professional landscape.

Ultimately, alumni networks have proven to be a vital asset in shaping the careers of graduates, particularly in competitive fields like finance, management, and technology. The ability to leverage connections with industry leaders and gain access to mentorship opportunities significantly accelerates career advancement. Institutions like Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, and INSEAD exemplify how strong alumni ties can open doors to exclusive job prospects, internships, and industry insights that are often out of reach for others. As the job market becomes increasingly competitive, the advantage of having a solid network cannot be overstated.

06/

Cultural Wayfinding: Language and Inclusivity

Last but not least, language and cultural adaptability are vital factors that significantly affect a student’s success and well-being while studying abroad. For international students, adjusting to a new environment can be challenging, especially when language barriers and cultural differences come into play. Research shows that students who choose study destinations with familiar languages or culturally inclusive environments tend to report higher levels of satisfaction and academic success. A survey conducted by Education First in 2021 found that students studying in English-speaking countries like the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom were better able to integrate socially and academically.86 This advantage is not only due to the language but also the inclusive atmosphere these countries foster, which plays a crucial role in easing the transition for international students.

Countries such as the Netherlands and Germany, which offer a large number of English-taught programs, have become increasingly popular among non-native speakers looking for quality education without the need to master a new language beforehand. The German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) reports that more than 20% of Germany’s higher education programs are now offered in English, particularly in fields like engineering, technology, and business.87 Similarly, the Netherlands has positioned itself as a top choice for international students by providing over 2,000 English-taught courses and promoting a culturally inclusive environment.88 These efforts have attracted students from diverse backgrounds who seek both a world-class education and a welcoming social setting.

It is important to highlight the fact that English has firmly established itself as the lingua franca in both academic research and global business, significantly influencing the decisions of international students when choosing universities and courses. According to a report by the British Council, over 90% of the world’s top academic journals are published in English, making proficiency in the language essential for researchers seeking to maximize the impact of their work.89 This dominance extends beyond academia into the realms of technology and business, where English is the primary language of communication. The World Economic Forum highlights that 75% of global business communication occurs in English90, and it does not come as a surprise that a study by the European Commission found that English proficiency is a key factor in hiring decisions within multinational corporations.91 This alignment with the lingua franca of both academia and industry ensures that graduates are better positioned for research collaborations, high-impact publications, and career opportunities in leading tech and business sectors.

The cultural environment of the host country also plays a significant role in student success. Cultural psychologist Dr. Li Wei emphasizes that “A culturally inclusive environment reduces stress and supports academic performance. Students who feel culturally accepted are more likely to thrive both socially and academically”.92 This aligns with findings from a study published in the Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, which showed that students who experience cultural acceptance are more likely to succeed in their academic pursuits and report higher levels of well-being.93 For many students, a supportive cultural atmosphere not only improves their learning experience but also contributes to their overall happiness and mental health during their studies abroad.

The Netherlands for instance is known for its inclusive social policies and strong emphasis on student well-being, making it an ideal destination for students seeking a comfortable and supportive environment. According to a report by the European Commission, the country’s efforts to accommodate international students through cultural integration programs have significantly increased student satisfaction and retention rates.94

Canada is another prime example of a country that has successfully integrated cultural inclusivity into its education system. The Canadian Bureau for International Education (CBIE) reports that 95% of international students in Canada cite feeling welcomed due to the country’s multicultural policies and support systems designed for newcomers.95 Additionally, Canada offers extensive resources, such as language support services and cultural orientation programs, which help students adjust more quickly. These initiatives not only enhance the academic experience but also support long-term social integration, which is crucial for students considering permanent residency after graduation.

Ultimately, for families and students planning higher education abroad, the language and cultural environment of the host country should be carefully evaluated to ensure a smooth transition and successful academic journey. Countries that offer programs in English, even if English is not the primary language, provide a significant advantage by reducing culture shock and enhancing students’ well-being. As the global education landscape becomes increasingly competitive, selecting a destination that prioritizes inclusivity and provides robust support systems can be a game-changer. Students who are able to navigate cultural differences more easily are better positioned to excel both academically and personally, paving the way for a successful international education experience.

07/

Reaching the Destination

The decision of where to pursue higher education involves much more than academic rankings. As students and families navigate their options, they should look beyond academic prestige to factors like quality of life, employability, financial considerations, and cultural adaptability. These elements, supported by research and expert advice, provide a comprehensive framework for selecting a country that aligns with both educational goals and personal well-being.

The journey to higher education is not only about reaching an academic destination but about finding a place that feels like a second home. By focusing on a holistic approach and balancing practical needs with personal preferences, families can guide students toward a fulfilling and successful international education experience.

Global Education Leaders: Breaking Down Top Performers Across Key Metrics

The Global Education Report (GER) ranks the U.S., U.K., Australia, Germany, and Canada as the top five higher education destinations, each excelling in different areas. The U.S. leads in work conditions and employability but struggles with high tuition and student debt. The U.K. maintains strong academic prestige, though rising costs and post-Brexit policies have impacted international enrollments. Australia offers a balance of education quality and employability, but high living costs remain a challenge. Germany excels in affordability, attracting students with tuition-free education and strong innovation rankings. Canada combines quality education, high salaries, and a welcoming immigration system, making it a cost-effective alternative to the U.S. This ranking highlights that while prestige matters, affordability, career prospects, and quality of life are increasingly shaping student choices.

The radar chart below compares key indicators for international higher education destinations, including the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, and Canada, the top five in the overall index of the Global Education Report. Each country demonstrates strengths and weaknesses across various dimensions like fees, cost of living, healthcare, employability, happiness, and quality of life.

gcs-GER-FR-img-7

It’s no surprise that the United States ranks first in the Global Education Report (GER). The country is home to some of the world’s most prestigious universities, consistently recognized for their academic excellence, cutting-edge research, and strong industry connections. Institutions like Harvard, MIT, and Stanford frequently top global rankings such as THE and QS. Graduates from these universities enjoy outstanding career prospects, high starting salaries, and strong employer demand, both within the U.S. and internationally. Additionally, the country leads the Work Conditions Sub-Index, offering a unique combination of elite education, strong employability, competitive salaries, and a business-friendly environment. For example, MIT graduates typically begin their careers with salaries around $110,000, reaching an average of $195,000 at mid-career—underscoring the strength of the U.S. higher education system and job market.96

However, the cost of attending university in the United States has risen dramatically over the decades, reaching unprecedented levels in 2024. Elite institutions like Pepperdine University, University of Southern California (USC), and Northwestern University now have a total annual cost of attendance (COA) nearing or surpassing $95,000. Attending prestigious institutions like Harvard University, MIT, and Stanford University also comes with a significant financial commitment. Harvard’s total annual cost is approximately $82,866, covering tuition, housing, food, and additional fees. MIT’s tuition alone is $61,990, bringing the total estimated annual cost to around $62,396. Similarly, Stanford University’s cost of attendance reaches about $76,312, factoring in tuition and room and board. Even historically more affordable public universities have seen substantial increases; for instance, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill charges approximately $9,000 for in-state students, a stark contrast to the mere $504 annual fee from 30 years ago. The primary drivers behind this surge in costs include reduced state funding for public universities, increased administrative expenses, and market pressures on private institutions.

As college costs have soared, student debt in the U.S. has reached critical levels. In 2024, total student loan debt stands at approximately $1.77 trillion, with the average federal student loan debt per borrower at around $38,375.97 Federal student loan interest rates for undergraduates have risen to 6.53%, while graduate loans are at 8.08%, and loans are at a steep 9.08%.98 Private loan rates can climb even higher, depending on creditworthiness. These rising costs and interest rates have made it increasingly difficult for graduates to manage their debts, with many delaying homeownership, family planning, and other major life milestones.

The United Kingdom remains one of the world’s most sought-after destinations for international students, boasting prestigious institutions like Oxford, Cambridge, and Imperial College London. In Scotland, universities such as Edinburgh, Glasgow, and St. Andrews further solidify the country’s academic reputation. However, studying in the UK comes with significant financial challenges, as international students face tuition fees ranging from £10,000 to £38,000 per year ($12,000 to $47,000). Additionally, living costs in major cities like London and Edinburgh are among the highest in Europe, with students needing between £1,500 and £2,000 per month for accommodation, food, and other expenses. These rising costs, combined with Brexit-related policy shifts, have reshaped the international student landscape in the UK.

Before Brexit, EU students benefited from “home fee status,” allowing them to pay the same tuition as UK residents and access student loans. However, the removal of these privileges led to a 53% drop in first-year EU enrollments in UK universities between 2019 and 2022.99

Despite this decline, the UK has experienced a surge in non-EU international students, largely due to the introduction of policies like the Graduate Route visa, which enables postgraduates to stay and work for two years after graduation.100 In 2020/21, the UK reached a record-breaking 605,130 international student enrolments, with non-EU student numbers increasing by 10.6%, particularly from India and China.101

Brexit has also significantly affected the UK’s research funding, with applications to Horizon 2020 falling by nearly 40% between 2015 and 2018, resulting in a 32% decrease in successful UK participants.102 The loss of nearly half a billion euros in EU funding has weakened the country’s research competitiveness and its ability to attract top academic talent. Meanwhile, key programs like the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellowships have seen a 35% decline in scientists relocating to UK institutions, leading to talent redirection towards countries like Spain and Italy. This trend has raised concerns about the UK’s diminishing influence in global research collaborations, despite government efforts to offset losses through domestic funding schemes.

Despite these challenges, the UK continues to hold the second position in the Global Education Report, driven by its world-class education system, strong investment in technology and innovation, and its strategic position between Europe and North America. Furthermore, while Brexit initially reduced EU student enrollments, the country has since become more open to students from Asia, the Middle East, and other regions, reinforcing its appeal as a global education hub. With competitive post-study work opportunities, top-ranked universities, and a strong business environment, the UK remains one of the most attractive destinations for international students, balancing prestige with increasing opportunities for global talent.

In the 2020/21 academic year, the United Kingdom achieved its goal of hosting 600,000 international higher education students nearly a decade ahead of schedule, with a total of 605,130 international students enrolled. This milestone was significantly influenced by the growth in non-EU student enrolments, which increased by 10.6% from the previous year, reaching 452,225 students. In contrast, EU student enrolments experienced a modest rise of 3.5%, totalling 152,905 students.103

These trends underscore the profound impact of immigration policies on shaping the demographic profile of international students. Restrictive measures, such as increased tuition fees and stringent visa requirements, can deter prospective students, as evidenced by the decline in EU enrolments post-Brexit. Conversely, policies that offer clear and accessible pathways for post-study work opportunities can enhance a country’s appeal as a study destination. The UK’s experience illustrates how strategic policy decisions directly influence international student mobility and enrolment patterns.

For countries aiming to attract global talent, the formulation of friendly visa pathways is crucial. Simplified visa procedures, opportunities for employment during and after studies, and transparent pathways to permanent residency can serve as significant incentives for international students. Research indicates that visa policies are a major consideration for students when choosing a study destination, with complex or restrictive visa processes potentially deterring applicants.104 Data shows the UK’s post-Brexit experience highlights the critical role of immigration and visa policies in shaping the landscape of international higher education.

Canada offers numerous advantages for international students seeking a high-quality education and an enhanced quality of life. The country’s strong healthcare system and emphasis on safety contribute to its appeal as a study destination. Additionally, Canada’s Post-Graduation Work Permit (PGWP) program allows eligible graduates to gain valuable Canadian work experience, which can be a pathway to permanent residency.105 Financially, international undergraduate students in Canada pay an average tuition fee of approximately CA$36,100 per year, while graduate students pay around CA$21,100 annually.106 Living expenses vary by location but typically average about CA$15,000 per year. These costs are often lower than those in other popular study destinations, making Canada an attractive option for students seeking affordability without compromising on quality. Moreover, Canada’s multicultural society and welcoming immigration policies create an inclusive environment for international students. The PGWP program, for instance, enables graduates to work in Canada for up to three years, providing a valuable opportunity to gain work experience and potentially pursue permanent residency.

Germany and Australia offer compelling alternatives, particularly for students looking for a combination of quality education and affordability. Germany excels in affordability (low tuition fees and moderate cost of living), making it an excellent destination for students who prioritize financial sustainability. Australia, on the other hand, offers a balance between academic excellence and employability, though it comes at a slightly higher cost of living. In sum, the ideal country for international students depends on their priorities: the United States and the United Kingdom are optimal for students focused on employability and top-tier universities, while Germany and Canada are better suited for those looking for a balance between quality of life and affordability. Australia remains a strong contender for those who seek both high employability rates and a high quality of life, albeit with a moderate financial commitment.

gcs-GER-FR-img-8

The bar and line chart above compares the employability rates and salary potential in five major higher education destinations: the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, and Canada. The data highlights a correlation between competitive salaries and low unemployment rates across the top five countries in the Global Education Report (GER). In all cases, unemployment rates remain relatively low, indicating robust and competitive job markets. The United States leads with the highest average salary and low unemployment rates, showcasing its efficient labor market and strong industrial base, particularly in engineering and manufacturing, demonstrating that thriving economies can sustain both high salaries and low unemployment, creating attractive opportunities for graduates and professionals.

Meanwhile, Canada, despite having slightly higher unemployment rate (5.37%) compared to other countries, it offers the second-highest salary, indicating a competitive job market where higher wages are necessary to attract and retain talent. As one of the most immigrant-friendly countries, Canada has actively promoted pathways for international students to transition into the workforce through Post-Graduation Work Permits (PGWP) and various permanent residency programs like the Express Entry system. While this approach enhances the labor pool and fuels long-term economic growth, it also creates short-term labor market pressures.

Furthermore, Canada’s high-quality education system and strong salaries make it an attractive destination for international students, but their post-graduation employment success depends on factors such as industry demand, regional job availability, and employer willingness to sponsor foreign talent. While sectors like technology, healthcare, and finance actively recruit skilled professionals, other fields may have more competition or limited opportunities, particularly for those without Canadian work experience. This dynamic means that while Canada remains a top choice for global talent, continued adjustments in immigration policies, labor market integration, and regional job distribution will be crucial in maintaining a balance between attracting international students and ensuring strong employment outcomes.

Australia, the UK, and Germany all offer attractive opportunities for international students, but each country has distinct strengths and challenges in retaining global talent. Australia strikes a balance with moderate unemployment (3.67%) and mid-range salaries, benefiting from flexible labor policies and strong post-study work visas like the Temporary Graduate Visa (subclass 485). However, job competition in non-high-demand sectors can create short-term employment challenges for international graduates. The UK, with its higher salaries but slightly higher unemployment (4.06%), has faced post-Brexit labor shortages and stricter visa regulations, making it harder for international graduates to transition into the workforce despite the Graduate Route visa allowing up to two years of post-study work. Additionally, rising living costs and skill mismatches make job retention more difficult. Meanwhile, Germany boasts the lowest unemployment (3.05%), a highly stable job market, and a strong vocational training system, but language barriers, bureaucratic hiring processes, and strict qualification recognition can slow down the integration of international graduates, despite opportunities through the Job Seeker Visa and Blue Card program. While Australia offers flexibility, the UK struggles with labor policy shifts, and Germany provides stability with some structural challenges, all three countries remain top destinations for international students seeking long-term employment prospects.

Recommendations

For International Students

  • Optimize Destination Choice Based on Cost & Quality: Students should prioritize affordable yet high-quality education destinations by considering tuition fees, living costs, and available scholarships.
  • Focus on Employability & Long-Term Career Prospects: International students must choose study destinations with strong job markets, favorable work visa policies, and high demand for their chosen field should they want to stay in the destination country in the future.
  • Evaluate Quality of Life & Cultural Fit: Students should consider safety, healthcare, inclusivity, and cultural adaptability when selecting a study destination to ensure a positive experience.
  • Plan for Long-Term Goals: Students must assess permanent residency pathways, career opportunities, and financial sustainability to align their education with future life goals.

For Universities

  • Enhance Affordability & Financial Support: Universities should expand scholarships, flexible tuition models, and student loan programs while improving housing affordability for students and financial literacy to make higher education more accessible.
  • Improve Employability & Career Outcomes: Institutions must strengthen industry partnerships, enhance career services, provide on-campus work opportunities, and advocate with governments for post-graduation work policies to improve student employability.
  • Diversify Student Recruitment: Universities should attract a broader international student base by increasing English-taught programs, targeting emerging markets, opening branch campuses, and leveraging AI-driven recruitment strategies.
  • Enhance Campus Inclusivity & Student Well-being: Institutions must foster inclusive and supportive environments by implementing cultural adaptation programs, mental health services, language support, and anti-discrimination policies.
  • Strengthen Innovation & Research Ecosystems: Universities should invest in interdisciplinary research, AI-driven education, research funding, and knowledge transfer programs to drive global innovation and academic excellence.

For Policy Makers

  • Enhance Immigration Policies to Attract & Retain Talent: Countries that integrate higher education with labor market needs retain more international graduates, benefiting their economies and addressing skills shortages. Thus, governments should implement streamlined visa processes, post-graduation work permits, and clear residency pathways to retain talent after graduation.
  • Invest in Higher Education & Research Infrastructure: Policymakers must increase funding for universities, foster industry-academia collaboration in public-private partnerships, and develop innovation hubs to enhance global competitiveness.
  • Strengthen Global Education Cooperation: Countries should expand student exchange programs, dual-degree partnerships, and international scholarships to attract and retain top global talent.
  • Address Regional Disparities in Higher Education: Policymakers must invest in educational infrastructure, employability programs, and research initiatives to improve access and quality in underrepresented regions.
  • Improve Cost Accessibility for International Students: Governments should offer tuition subsidies, such as low-interest education loans and flexible repayment options, affordable student housing, and financial incentives to make higher education more accessible and competitive globally.

Geographical Regions

North America

North America remains one of the most sought-after study destinations, with the United States (1st) and Canada (5th) ranking in the GER. However, high costs and complex immigration processes impact international student retention.

icon-notice-light-blulb-night-blue
Key Challenges and Recommended Strategies:
– The U.S. faces declining international enrolment due to high tuition costs, restrictive H-1B visa caps, and green card backlogs. U.S. should simplify the transition from F-1 (student visa) to H-1B (work visa) by increasing H-1B quotas for STEM graduates and creating a national post-graduation work permit similar to Canada’s PGWP.
– Canada leads in student retention but faces increasing competition as tuition costs rise for non-residents. The country should maintain its pro-immigration stance by expanding residency pathways for graduates and increasing funding for tuition subsidies.

Europe

Europe is home to five of the top ten countries for higher education in the GER, including the U.K. (2nd), Germany (4th), France (6th), the Netherlands (7th), and Switzerland (8th). With affordable tuition and high quality of life, Europe continues to attract students.

icon-notice-light-blulb-night-blue
Key Challenges and Recommended Strategies:
– Brexit has significantly reshaped the UK’s international student landscape, leading to a 50% decline in EU student enrollments due to higher tuition fees and stricter visa policies. However, this loss has been offset by a surge in Asian student enrollments, with Indian students surpassing Chinese students as the largest group, marking a 273% increase in visas granted. Meanwhile, Chinese student numbers have risen by 41% over five years. To restore balance and maintain its status as a global education hub, the UK should consider reinstating home-fee status for EU students or introducing tuition discounts to recover lost European enrollments while continuing to attract international talent.
– Germany and the Nordic countries continue to attract international students withtuition-free education and high-quality academic institutions, yet bureaucratic visa processes slow down student integration and workforce transition. To maintain their competitiveness as global education hubs, Germany should streamline its student-to-work visa process by reducing paperwork, facilitating post-graduation work visas, and expediting residency applications, ensuring a seamless transition for graduates into the labor market.
– Southern European countries like Portugal and Italy face high youth unemployment, which limits job prospects for international graduates. These countries should develop job-matching programs in high-growth sectors such as digital industries, green energy, and tourism, ensuring that international graduates have clear pathways into the workforce and contribute to the local economy.
– To enhance employability,France and the Netherlands should introduce tax incentives for companies hiring international graduates, making it more attractive for businesses to retain foreign talent.

Asia-Pacific

The Asia-Pacific region is rapidly emerging as a major education hub, with countries like China (9th), Singapore (10th), Taiwan (15th), and South Korea (16th) gaining global recognition.

icon-notice-light-blulb-night-blue
Key Challenges and Recommended Strategies:
Despite heavy investment in higher education, China struggles to retain international graduates due to strict work visa policies and political concerns. However, China actively uses international students as diplomatic ambassadors, strengthening political and commercial ties with other nations. Should China seek to further attract and retain top global talent, it must introduce a dedicated post-study work visa, easing employment restrictions for foreign graduates. This would not only enhance China’s position as a leading global education hub but also reinforce its geopolitical influence and commercial partnerships through long-term talent engagement.

– Singapore has firmly positioned itself as a top-tier education and business hub, attracting international students with its world-class universities, cutting-edge research facilities, and strong ties to global industries. However, work visa restrictions and limited post-graduation employment opportunities pose significant barriers to retaining skilled graduates, despite the country’s demand for high-tech talent in sectors such as finance, AI, biotechnology, and digital innovation. To sustain its competitive edge and maximize its investment in global talent, Singapore should expand its post-study work visa policies, making it easier for international students to transition into the workforce and secure high-paying jobs.
– Japan and South Korea have established themselves as premier destinations for international students, offering world-class universities, advanced research opportunities, and strong technology-driven economies. However, language barriers, complex visa regulations, rigid employment policies, and cultural integration challenges significantly hinder their ability to retain skilled graduates and integrate them into the workforce. To remain competitive in the global education market, both countries must expand English-taught programs, particularly in STEM, business, and high-growth industries, to attract a more diverse student base.
– Australia and New Zealand remain top global study destinations, known for their high-quality education, excellent quality of life standards, and strong work-life balance, making them highly attractive to international students. However, rising living costs, expensive tuition fees, and increasing anti-immigration sentiments are undermining their ability to retain skilled graduates, particularly in high-demand industries such as technology, healthcare, and engineering. To counter this trend, Australia should extend its Temporary Graduate Visa (Subclass 485) beyond four years for students in critical sectors, allowing them more time to secure employment and transition into permanent residency. Similarly, New Zealand should introduce more flexible work visa policies that provide international graduates with long-term stability and clearer pathways to the job market.

Latin-America

Latin America offers affordable education, cultural diversity, and strong academic programs, making it an attractive destination for international students. However, limited job prospects, visa barriers, and low research funding prevent long-term student retention and global competitiveness.

icon-notice-light-blulb-night-blue
Key Challenges and Recommended Strategies:
– Brazil, Chile, and Mexico must improve post-graduation employment pathways by developing regional work visas that allow graduates to move within Latin America for job opportunities. Additionally, Mexico should establish itself as a premier destination for Spanish-speaking students, offering residency incentives for graduates in high-demand industries like manufacturing, engineering, and business.
– Furthermore, Colombia and Argentina must increase research funding and establish international collaborations, particularly in STEM fields, to elevate their global university rankings. By improving employment pathways, strengthening visa policies, and enhancing research capabilities, Latin America can boost international enrollments, retain skilled graduates, and position itself as a competitive global education hub.

MENA (Middle-East and Northern Africa)

The MENA region must enhance visa accessibility and labor market integration by introducing long-term student-to-work visas in the UAE, employer-sponsored work permits in Saudi Arabia and Qatar, and faculty exchange programs in North Africa, ensuring stronger talent retention and global competitiveness in higher education.

icon-notice-light-blulb-night-blue
Key Challenges and Recommended Strategies:
– The MENA region is rapidly emerging as a global education hub, with the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar leading investments in higher education and international university partnerships. However, visa restrictions and unclear post-graduation work policies hinder long-term student retention and workforce integration.
– To solidify its status as a top study destination, the UAE should introduce a long-term student-to-work visa, allowing graduates to remain in the country for at least five years post-study, easing their transition into the labor market.
– Similarly, Saudi Arabia and Qatar must expand employer-sponsored work permits, ensuring clear employment pathways for international graduates in key sectors like technology, finance, and energy.
– Additionally, North African nations such as Egypt and Morocco should strengthen faculty exchange programs with European institutions, improving research competitiveness and academic collaboration.

Africa

Africa’s higher education system is rapidly expanding, with South Africa leading in research output and university rankings, yet limited funding, infrastructure challenges, and visa restrictions hinder its ability to attract and retain international students.

icon-notice-light-blulb-night-blue
Key Challenges and Recommended Strategies:
– South Africa should ease work visa regulations for international graduates, particularly in high-demand fields such as healthcare and engineering, to retain skilled talent and address labor shortages.
– African nations should establish an intra-African education visa, enabling students to study and work across multiple countries, facilitating regional mobility and knowledge exchange.
– Nigeria, Kenya, and Ghana must significantly increase investment in research funding and faculty development, fostering stronger academic collaborations with U.S. and European institutions. Programs like the Intra-Africa Academic Mobility Scheme, funded by the European Union, provide valuable opportunities for university staff and students to receive training at European universities, enhancing academic excellence and international knowledge exchange.

Conclusion

Global mobility in higher education has become a defining feature of the 21st century, shaping the lives of students, the strategies of universities, and the policies of nations. Over 6 million students studied abroad in 2023, and this number is expected to surpass 10 million by 2030. This mobility fosters cultural exchange, innovation, and economic growth, highlighting the interconnected nature of the modern education landscape. For students, studying abroad offers access to world-class education, exposure to diverse cultures, and enhanced career opportunities. For universities, international students contribute to global rankings, research output, and financial sustainability. Destination countries benefit from economic inflows, talent acquisition, and enriched cultural diversity, while origin countries gain remittances and, in some cases, skilled graduates who return home to drive local development.

Top destinations for international students, such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia, continue to attract the majority due to their prestigious universities, robust research environments, and promising employability outcomes. However, Europe is increasingly emerging as the region of choice for international students, with countries like Germany, France, the Netherlands, and Nordic nations offering high-quality education, affordable tuition, and excellent quality of life. At the same time, Asia is rapidly catching up, with China, Singapore, and select institutions in India positioning themselves as formidable global education hubs. These countries are leveraging strategic investments in research, innovation, and English-taught programs to attract a more diverse student body.

The motivations driving international students to choose a destination extend far beyond academics. Quality of life, inclusivity, and migrant acceptance are becoming critical factors in decision-making. Countries with robust healthcare systems, cultural openness, and societal acceptance of migrants create environments where students feel supported and welcomed. This is particularly evident in Nordic countries and Canada, where policies prioritize integration and well-being. Furthermore, nations with streamlined visa policies and clear pathways for integration into the job market are attracting a larger share of international talent. Countries offering post-graduation work visas and residency options, such as Germany, Australia, and Canada, are seen as destinations where students can build long-term futures.

The decision of where to study is as relevant as the institution itself. A country’s policies on inclusivity, societal openness, and support for international students profoundly impact the educational experience. Students and their families are increasingly evaluating whether a destination aligns with their financial circumstances, cultural preferences, and long-term career aspirations. For instance, European countries are increasingly favored for their balance of academic excellence and affordability, while the U.S., despite its top-ranked universities, faces criticism for high costs, student debt, and complex immigration processes.

The financial burdens of studying abroad, particularly in high-cost destinations like the United States and the United Kingdom, underscore the importance of cost considerations in student decision-making. Rising tuition fees and living expenses in these countries have led many students to explore more affordable destinations. The United States, for instance, remains the most expensive destination for higher education, with tuition inflation and student debt exceeding $1.7 trillion in 2024. In contrast, countries with affordable or subsidized education systems, such as Germany and Scandinavian nations, are becoming increasingly popular for students seeking high-quality education without the financial strain.

Additionally, flexible migration pathways are a key factor in attracting international students, as they offer a clear and structured route to stay, work, and integrate into the host country after graduation. Countries with such policies not only appeal to students seeking quality education but also to those planning long-term careers and settlement. For instance, Canada’s Post-Graduation Work Permit (PGWP) allows graduates to work in the country for up to three years, and its Express Entry system provides pathways to permanent residency for skilled workers, including international students. Similarly, Australia offers Temporary Graduate visas, which enable students to gain work experience in their field of study, often leading to permanent residency. Germany provides an 18-month residence permit for graduates to find employment, capitalizing on its strong job market in STEM and engineering fields. These policies enhance the value proposition for international students, making the destination not just a place to study but also a launching pad for future opportunities. Flexible migration pathways also help host countries retain global talent, addressing labor shortages and fostering innovation in key industries, creating a mutually beneficial dynamic between students and their host nations.

Ultimately, the global flow of international students creates a virtuous cycle of benefits. Host countries gain from economic contributions, cultural diversity, and talent retention, while students acquire knowledge, skills, and global networks that enhance their career prospects. Societies benefit as these students act as cultural ambassadors, fostering mutual understanding and driving innovation. Universities, in turn, thrive by attracting diverse perspectives, bolstering their global reputation, and securing critical revenue streams. The cumulative impact is a stronger, more interconnected world where education serves as a bridge for collaboration and progress.

Footnotes
  1. OECD. (2024). Education at a Glance 2024: OECD indicators. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org↩︎↩︎
  2. European Commission. (2023). International student mobility: Trends and projections. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu↩︎
  3. QS Intelligence Unit. (2023). The future of international student mobility: Trends and insights. Retrieved from https://www.qs.com
    ↩︎
  4. Institute of International Education (IIE). (2023). International student mobility trends and insights. Retrieved from https://www.iie.org↩︎
  5. UNESCO. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org↩︎
  6. British Council. (2023). The impact of international student mobility on higher education. Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.org↩︎↩︎
  7. OECD. (2023). Education at a Glance 2023: OECD indicators. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org
    ↩︎
  8. Institute of International Education (IIE). (2023). Open Doors Report on international educational exchange. Retrieved from https://www.iie.org↩︎↩︎
  9. European Commission. (2023). Trends in international student mobility: Opportunities and challenges. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu↩︎
  10. QS Intelligence Unit. (2023). Global student mobility trends and insights. Retrieved from https://www.qs.com
    ↩︎
  11. NAFSA: Association of International Educators. (2024). International student economic value tool. Retrieved from https://www.nafsa.org↩︎↩︎
  12. World Bank. (2024). The role of higher education in developing economies. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org
    ↩︎
  13. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2022). Education at a Glance 2022: OECD indicators. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org↩︎
  14. National Association of Foreign Student Advisers (NAFSA). (2023). International student economic value tool. Retrieved from https://www.nafsa.org↩︎
  15. Higher Education Journal. (2022). Diversity and innovation in academic settings: The impact of international students. Higher Education, 83(4), 765-789.↩︎
  16. Higher Education Journal. (2022). Diversity and innovation in academic settings: The impact of international students. Higher Education, 83(4), 765-789.↩︎
  17. European Commission. (2023). Skills and talent: Attracting international graduates to address demographic challenges. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu↩︎
  18. Australian Department of Home Affairs. (2023). International students and migration outcomes. Retrieved from https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au
    ↩︎
  19. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2023). The role of cultural exchange in fostering global peace and understanding. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org↩︎
  20. British Council. (2022). The impact of international students on soft power. Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.org↩︎
  21. Canadian Bureau for International Education (CBIE). (2023). International student survey: Insights on retention and immigration. Retrieved from https://cbie.ca
    ↩︎
  22. Education Data Initiative. (n.d.). College tuition inflation rate. Retrieved January 24, 2025, from https://educationdata.org/college-tuition-inflation-rate↩︎↩︎
  23. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Federal Student Aid. (2024). Fiscal Year 2024 Annual Report. Retrieved from https://studentaid.gov/sites/default/files/fy2024-fsa-annual-report.pdf↩︎
  24. Federal Reserve Bank of New York. (2017). Student loan expansion and tuition increases. Retrieved from https://www.newyorkfed.org/ and James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal. (2017). The Bennett hypothesis turns 30. Retrieved from https://www.jamesgmartin.center/↩︎
  25. Springer, R. (2019). The Bennett Hypothesis revisited in professional education. Review of Higher Education. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/ and Kelchen, R. (2019). Law schools and tuition increases: Testing the Bennett Hypothesis. Retrieved from https://robertkelchen.com/↩︎
  26. Universities Canada. (2021). International student tuition and trends in Canada. Retrieved from https://www.univcan.ca↩︎
  27. GOV.UK. (2024). Higher education reform to back opportunity and protect students. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/higher-education-reform-to-back-opportunity-and-protect-students↩︎
  28. Le Monde. (2024, September 29). Au Royaume-Uni, certaines universités risquent de ne pas passer l’hiver. Retrieved from https://www.lemonde.fr/economie/article/2024/09/29/au-royaume-uni-certaines-universites-risquent-de-ne-pas-passer-l-hiver_6338294_3234.html and The Times. (2024). Durham and Cardiff universities to cut hundreds of jobs. Retrieved from https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/cardiff-university-job-cuts-redundancies-82wzdgpk3
    ↩︎
  29. Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI). (2021, July 14). High inflation could devastate universities and leave students feeling overwhelmed by debt. Retrieved from https://www.hepi.ac.uk/2021/07/14/high-inflation-could-devastate-universities-and-leave-students-feeling-overwhelmed-by-debt↩︎
  30. DAAD Brussels. (2023, October 18). Record numbers of international exchange students: Germany 3rd in global ranking. Retrieved from https://www.daad-brussels.eu/en/2023/10/18/record-numbers-of-international-exchange-students-germany-3rd-in-global-ranking/↩︎
  31. QS Top Universities. (2024). QS World University Rankings 2024. Retrieved from https://www.topuniversities.com/↩︎↩︎↩︎
  32. Times Higher Education. (2024). World University Rankings 2024. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com↩︎↩︎
  33. Universities UK International. (2022). The economic impact of international students in the UK. Retrieved from https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/↩︎
  34. HSBC. (2024). Value of education: Higher and higher. Retrieved from https://www.hsbc.com↩︎
  35. OECD. (2023). Education at a Glance 2023: OECD indicators. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org↩︎
  36. Hurun Report. (2024). The Chinese millionaire study: Priorities and investments. Retrieved from https://www.hurun.net↩︎
  37. Institute of International Education (IIE). (2023). U.S. hosts over 1 million international students: Fastest growth for 40 years. Retrieved from https://www.iie.org/news/us-hosts-over-1-million-fastest-growth-for-40-years/
    ↩︎
  38. Financial Times. (2024). Masters in Management Rankings 2024. Retrieved from https://rankings.ft.com↩︎
  39. Tsinghua University. (n.d.). Overview: International Students. Retrieved January 14, 2025, from https://www.tsinghua.edu.cn/en/Admissions/International_Students1/Overview.htm↩︎↩︎
  40. Peking University. (2019, November 29). What motivates international students to study in China and apply to Peking University? Retrieved from https://english.pku.edu.cn/news_events/news/campus/9304.html↩︎
  41. Peking University. (2019, November 29). What motivates international students to study in China and apply to Peking University? Retrieved↩︎
  42. Trading Economics. (2023). China GDP. Retrieved from https://tradingeconomics.com/china/gdp↩︎
  43. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2023). Global flow of tertiary-level students. Retrieved from http://uis.unesco.org↩︎
  44. Erudera. (2023). China international student statistics. Retrieved from https://erudera.com/statistics/china/china-international-student-statistics↩︎
  45. The PIE News. (2021). How many international students study in China? Retrieved from https://thepienews.com/how-many-international-students-study-in-china↩︎
  46. Ministry of Education Singapore. (2021, May 11). Number of overseas Singaporean students and international students in Singapore. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/parliamentary-replies/20210511-number-of-overseas-singaporean-students-and-international-students-in-singapore↩︎
  47. Statista. (2023, December 21). Education in Singapore – statistics & facts. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/topics/5766/education-in-singapore/↩︎
  48. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (n.d.). Inbound internationally mobile students by country of origin. Retrieved from https://data.uis.unesco.org/index.aspx?queryid=3804↩︎
  49. Singapore Ministry of Education. (2023). Higher Education and Global Talent Policies. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/↩︎
  50. All India Survey on Higher Education. (2022). 46k foreign students enrolled in India, majority in UG courses. Hindustan Times. Retrieved from https://www.hindustantimes.com/education/news/aishe-report-46k-foreign-students-enrolled-in-india-majority-in-ug-courses-101706263981928.html↩︎
  51. Education for All in India. (2023). Economic influence of international students on India’s higher education system. Retrieved from https://educationforallinindia.com/economic-influence-of-international-students-on-indias-higher-education-system/↩︎
  52. British Council. (2023). India releases updated higher education statistics. Opportunities Insight. Retrieved from https://opportunities-insight.britishcouncil.org/short-articles/news/india-releases-updated-higher-education-statistics
    ↩︎
  53. Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3-4), 290-305.↩︎
  54. O’Callaghan, C. (2024, April 29). Why are international students avoiding the US and UK? Top Universities. Retrieved from https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings-articles/world-university-rankings/why-are-international-students-avoiding-us-uk
    ↩︎
  55. UK Council for International Student Affairs (UKCISA). (2023). Post-study work and immigration policies: Challenges for international students. Retrieved from https://www.ukcisa.org.uk and Institute of International Education (IIE). (2023). Impact of visa policies on international student mobility. Retrieved from https://www.iie.org↩︎
  56. Universities UK International (UUKi). (2023). Brexit and its impact on international student recruitment. Retrieved from https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk; British Council. (2023). Post-Brexit trends in international student mobility to the UK. Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.org; Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI). (2024). The impact of Brexit on UK higher education and student choices. Retrieved from https://www.hepi.ac.uk and Office for National Statistics (ONS). (2023). Post-Brexit changes in international student numbers. Retrieved from https://www.ons.gov.uk↩︎
  57. Canadian Bureau for International Education (CBIE). (2023). Canada’s policies on international students: Supporting access, work, and residency. Retrieved from https://cbie.ca and OECD. (2023). International student mobility and host country policies. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org↩︎
  58. Australian Government, Department of Education. (2023). International education in Australia: Supportive policies for student success. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.au↩︎
  59. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD). (2023). Studying in Germany: Pathways for international students. Retrieved from https://www.daad.de/en↩︎
  60. Netherlands Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science. (2024). International students in the Netherlands: Policies and support. Retrieved from https://www.government.nl/ministries/ministry-of-education-culture-and-science↩︎
  61. Education New Zealand (ENZ). (2023). International education in New Zealand: Supportive policies and pathways to residency. Retrieved from https://www.enz.govt.nz↩︎
  62. Swedish Council for Higher Education (UHR). (2023). Sweden’s approach to attracting international students: Affordable education and post-study opportunities. Retrieved from https://www.uhr.se↩︎
  63. International Student Barometer (ISB). (2024). Global student satisfaction survey: Safety, healthcare, and inclusiveness. Retrieved from https://www.i-graduate.org↩︎↩︎
  64. International Student Barometer (ISB). (2023). Discrimination experiences among international students in the UK. Retrieved from https://www.i-graduate.org↩︎
  65. Liu, M. (2024). The impact of social environments on international student success. Journal of International Education and Student Well-being, 16(2), 215-227.↩︎
  66. Al-Fayed, O. (2024). Personal interview on the importance of social inclusiveness in study abroad decisions. International Student Perspectives, 12(1), 102-105.
    ↩︎
  67. The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2022). Cost of living survey: Global cities ranking and analysis. Retrieved from https://www.eiu.com↩︎
  68. Numbeo. (2024). Cost of living indexes by city. Retrieved from https://www.numbeo.com↩︎
  69. Martinez, L. (2024). Personal interview on financial planning for international students. International Education Finance Insights, 18(3), 134-137.↩︎↩︎
  70. Government of Canada. (2024). Work off-campus as an international student. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca; German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD). (2024). Working in Germany as an international student. Retrieved from https://www.daad.de; UK Visas and Immigration. (2024). Working while studying in the UK. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk; Education New Zealand. (2024). Part-time work for international students. Retrieved from https://www.enz.govt.nz; Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service (INIS). (2024). Working while studying in Ireland. Retrieved from https://www.inis.gov.ie; Campus France. (2024). International students and part-time work in France. Retrieved from https://www.campusfrance.org; Netherlands Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science. (2024). Work options for international students. Retrieved from https://www.government.nl; Swedish Migration Agency. (2024). Work and study in Sweden. Retrieved from https://www.migrationsverket.se; Japan Student Services Organization (JASSO). (2024). Part-time work regulations for international students. Retrieved from https://www.jasso.go.jp, and U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2024). F-1 student visa: Employment opportunities. Retrieved from https://studyinthestates.dhs.gov.↩︎
  71. Erasmus+ Programme. (2024). European Union initiatives on international scholarships. Retrieved from https://erasmus-plus.ec.europa.eu↩︎
  72. Fulbright Program. (2024). Scholarships for international students in the United States. Retrieved from https://us.fulbrightonline.org↩︎
  73. The University of Melbourne in Australia, for example, offers the International Undergraduate Scholarship, which reduces tuition fees by up to 50%. Scholarships like these significantly reduce the financial burden on families, allowing them to allocate their budget towards other expenses or save for future needs.
    ↩︎
  74.  Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Education at a Glance 2021. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/↩︎
  75. World Economic Forum. (2022). Global Competitiveness Report. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/↩︎
  76. Canada Immigration and Citizenship Report. (2022). Global Talent Stream program: Enhancing skilled worker opportunities. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/
    ↩︎
  77. Smith, A. (2022). The impact of elite universities on career advancement: A longitudinal study. The Journal of Higher Education, 93(4), 450-467.↩︎
  78. Fernandez, A. M. (2023). Building leadership through alumni networks: Insights for higher education. Journal of Leadership Studies, 15(2), 120-134.↩︎
  79. LinkedIn. (2022). Analysis of global CEOs: Educational backgrounds and career trajectories. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/
    ↩︎
  80. LinkedIn. (2022). Analysis of global CEOs: Educational backgrounds and career trajectories. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/↩︎
  81. INSEAD Alumni Relations. (2022). Leveraging alumni networks for career success. Retrieved from https://www.insead.edu/↩︎
  82. LinkedIn. (2023). Analysis of global CEOs: Educational backgrounds and career trajectories. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com↩︎
  83. Harvard Business School. (2023). The power of alumni networks. Retrieved from https://www.hbs.edu/↩︎
  84. Times Higher Education. (2023). Universities producing the most CEOs. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com↩︎
  85. Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC). (2024). The role of alumni networks in job placements for business graduates. Retrieved from https://www.gmac.com↩︎
  86. Education First. (2021). Survey on cultural integration and student success. Retrieved from https://www.ef.com/↩︎
  87. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD). (2022). Study in Germany: English-taught programs and student experiences. Retrieved from https://www.daad.de/en/↩︎
  88. Netherlands Ministry of Education. (2023). English-taught programs and inclusivity initiatives. Retrieved from https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/↩︎
  89. British Council. (2023). The impact of English on global research and higher education. Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.org↩︎
  90. World Economic Forum. (2022). The future of jobs report. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org↩︎
  91. European Commission. (2023). Language skills and employability: The role of English proficiency. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu↩︎
  92. Li Wei, L. (2022). The role of cultural inclusivity in academic performance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 53(3), 320-337.↩︎
  93. Johnson, H., & Lee, M. (2022). The impact of cultural acceptance on international student well-being. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 54(2), 210-225.↩︎
  94. European Commission. (2023). Report on student integration and retention in the EU. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu
    ↩︎
  95. Canadian Bureau for International Education (CBIE). (2022). International student survey: Welcoming communities in Canada. Retrieved from https://cbie.ca/↩︎
  96. Statista. (2023). Top U.S. colleges by starting and mid-career pay of graduates. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/244473/top-us-colleges-by-starting-and-mid-career-pay-of-graduates/
    ↩︎
  97. Fool.com. (2024). Student loan debt statistics. The Motley Fool. https://www.fool.com/research/student-loan-debt-statistics/↩︎
  98. U.S. Department of Education. (2024). Annual notice of interest rates for fixed-rate federal student loans made under the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program. Federal Register. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/08/28/2024-19309/annual-notice-of-interest-rates-for-fixed-rate-federal-student-loans-made-under-the-william-d-ford↩︎
  99. ICEF Monitor. (2023). A closer look at post-Brexit trends in European student mobility. ICEF Monitor. https://monitor.icef.com/2023/08/a-closer-look-at-post-brexit-trends-in-european-student-mobility/
    ↩︎
  100. Universities UK. (2023). International student data. Universities UK. https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/what-we-do/policy-and-research/publications/features/uk-higher-education-data-international/international-student-data and House of Commons Library. (2023). Post-study work visas for international students. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-7976/↩︎
  101. Universities UK. (2023). International student data. Universities UK. https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/what-we-do/policy-and-research/publications/features/uk-higher-education-data-international/international-student-data and House of Commons Library. (2023). Post-study work visas for international students. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-7976/
    ↩︎
  102. The Royal Society. (2019). Brexit: UK science and innovation – Challenges and opportunities. https://royalsociety.org/-/media/news/2019/brexit-uk-science-impact.pdf↩︎
  103. British Council. (2021). Statistics from HESA show an increase in the UK’s international student enrolments in 2020/21 despite the pandemic. British Council.https://opportunities-insight.britishcouncil.org/features/statistics-hesa-show-increase-uks-international-student-enrolments-202021-despite-pandemic
    ↩︎
  104. Universities UK. (2021). Student visa system: Principles to reform. Retrieved from https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/sites/default/files/field/downloads/2021-07/student-visa-system-principles-to-reform.pdf↩︎
  105. Government of Canada. (n.d.). Work in Canada after you graduate: Path to permanent residence. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada. Retrieved February 5, 2025, from https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/study-canada/work/after-graduation/path-to-pr.html↩︎
  106. Government of Canada. (n.d.). About the post-graduation work permit [Webpage]. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/study-canada/work/after-graduation/about.html↩︎
Share this post:

Explore More with Related Reports

No data was found

Unpack the Details in Our Live Sessions

Tune into our expert-led podcast for a deeper dive into this topic. Whether you’re just starting out or weighing your options, this episode offers practical guidance and real-world insights to help you move forward with confidence.

Play Video

We’ll Help You Navigate

The most pressing barriers include insufficient funding, a shortage of trained teachers, lack of access to learning materials, and limited infrastructure such as electricity or internet connectivity. In rural areas, these issues are often compounded by long travel distances to schools and socio-cultural factors like gender inequality and early marriage.

Aliqua velit dolore aute ut quis aute exercitation aliqua. Nisi ipsum est cupidatat irure id esse fugiat nisi nulla consequat voluptate id. Qui quis deserunt ex tempor cupidatat labore ex commodo ut do est mollit adipisicing. Anim quis tempor minim ad irure. Velit aute nulla cupidatat ipsum ipsum velit consectetur mollit. Enim adipisicing minim laboris consequat laborum cillum aliqua qui irure eiusmod Lorem exercitation dolor enim.

Non consectetur commodo ex anim sint laborum eiusmod officia ipsum voluptate adipisicing exercitation do. Enim consequat dolore et id. Velit consectetur dolor excepteur id cupidatat duis laboris quis elit officia ullamco in commodo. Tempor tempor consectetur esse elit esse. Dolore velit dolor laborum nostrud ad ullamco id anim officia eiusmod. Lorem exercitation tempor in magna deserunt fugiat et commodo aliqua deserunt ex commodo. Do nulla elit Lorem aliqua cupidatat elit elit pariatur et. Laborum dolore ut consectetur officia aute enim proident. Veniam cupidatat dolore laboris proident exercitation est ipsum adipisicing officia Lorem reprehenderit sint exercitation anim elit.

Privacy Overview
Global Citizen Solutions logo featuring a stylized globe and modern typography in blue and green colors.

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

Analytics

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.